Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Apr;69(4):2574-82.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.69.4.2574-2582.1995.

DNA vaccination against persistent viral infection

Affiliations

DNA vaccination against persistent viral infection

L P Martins et al. J Virol. 1995 Apr.

Abstract

This study shows that DNA vaccination can confer protection against a persistent viral infection by priming CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). Adult BALB/c (H-2d) mice were injected intramuscularly with a plasmid expressing the nucleoprotein (NP) gene of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter. The LCMV NP contains the immunodominant CTL epitope (amino acids 118 to 126) recognized by mice of the H-2d haplotype. After three injections with 200 micrograms of NP DNA, the vaccinated mice were challenged with LCMV variants (clones 13 and 28b) that establish persistent infection in naive adult mice. Fifty percent of the DNA-vaccinated mice were protected, as evidenced by decreased levels of infectious virus in the blood and tissues, eventual clearance of viral antigen from all organs tested, the presence of an enhanced LCMV-specific CD8+ CTL response, and maintenance of memory CTL after clearance of virus infection. However, it should be noted that protection was seen in only half of the vaccinated mice, and we were unable to directly measure virus-specific immune responses in any of the DNA-vaccinated mice prior to LCMV challenge. Thus, at least in the system that we have used, gene immunization was a suboptimal method of inducing protective immunity and was several orders of magnitude less efficient than vaccination with live virus. In conclusion, our results show that DNA immunization works against a persistent viral infection but that efforts should be directed towards improving this novel method of vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Exp Med. 1968 Feb 1;127(2):327-39 - PubMed
    1. Virology. 1994 Feb 15;199(1):132-40 - PubMed
    1. J Immunol. 1976 Nov;117(5 Pt 1):1495-502 - PubMed
    1. Adv Immunol. 1980;30:275-331 - PubMed
    1. J Virol. 1981 Feb;37(2):755-8 - PubMed

Publication types