Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995 Apr 15;122(8):595-8.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-8-199504150-00007.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: a randomized trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: a randomized trial

N Singh et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.

Design: A randomized controlled trial.

Setting: University-affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center.

Patients: 60 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and ascites.

Interventions: Consecutive patients were randomly assigned to receive either no prophylaxis or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, one double-strength tablet daily, five times a week (Monday through Friday). Patient entry was stratified by serum bilirubin (> 51 mumol/L [> 3 mg/dL]), ascitic fluid protein (< 1 g/dL), and serum creatinine (> 177 mumol/L [> 2 mg/dL]) levels to ensure that high-risk patients would be similarly distributed in the two groups. The median duration of follow-up for the study patients was 90 days.

Main outcome measures: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or spontaneous bacteremia as defined by objective criteria.

Results: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or spontaneous bacteremia developed in 27% (8 of 30) of patients who did not receive prophylaxis compared with 3% (1 of 30) of patients receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (P = 0.025). Overall, infections developed in 9 of 30 patients (30%) not receiving prophylaxis and in 1 of 30 patients (3%) receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (P = 0.012). Death occurred in 6 of 30 patients (20%) who did not receive prophylaxis and in 2 of 30 patients (7%) who received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (P = 0.15). Side effects--particularly, hematologic toxicity--could not be attributed to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in any patient.

Conclusions: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was efficacious, safe, and cost-effective for the prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances