Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1995 Jan;73(1):32-6.
doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.1.32.

QT dispersion and components of the QT interval in ischaemia and infarction

Affiliations
Comparative Study

QT dispersion and components of the QT interval in ischaemia and infarction

P D Higham et al. Br Heart J. 1995 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate changes in QT dispersion and components of the QT interval in patients admitted with unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction and to study the dynamics of these changes in patients with infarction.

Methods: Prospective study recording electrocardiograms at 50 mm/s in patients admitted with typical cardiac chest pain. Subsequent confirmation of acute myocardial infarction according to standard criteria. Single blind analysis for QT dispersion and QT components using a digitiser and simple computer program. Results are expressed as native QT dispersion, QTc dispersion, and the QT dispersion ratio defined as QT dispersion divided by cycle length and expressed as a percentage.

Results: QT dispersion, QTc dispersion, and QT dispersion ratio were all higher in patients with acute myocardial infarction than in those with unstable angina (mean (SD) 66 (18) ms, 75 (26) ms1/2, and 8.1 (2.4)% compared with 38 (13) ms, 39 (13) ms1/2, and 4.5 (1.7) % respectively). Dynamic changes in QTc dispersion were seen after acute infarction with significant differences in the QT components occurring between the different patient groups. Levels of QT dispersion (87 (15) ms), QTc dispersion (105 (17) ms1/2), and QT dispersion ratio (11.7 (0.8)%) in the four patients with ventricular fibrillation were significantly higher. Use of QT dispersion ratio gave a narrower confidence interval.

Conclusion: QT dispersion is increased after myocardial infarction and levels are higher in patients with ventricular fibrillation. The changes in QT dispersion are dynamic and may reflect the changing pattern of underlying ventricular recovery of ventricular excitability, which is profoundly disturbed in the earliest phase of acute infarction. Expressing QT dispersion as a percentage of cycle length (QT dispersion ratio) rather than using standard rate correction may be superior in identifying patients who develop ventricular fibrillation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Cardiol. 1988 Jan 1;61(1):83-7 - PubMed
    1. G Ital Cardiol. 1988 Apr;18(4):290-5 - PubMed
    1. Physiol Rev. 1989 Oct;69(4):1049-169 - PubMed
    1. Circ Res. 1990 Mar;66(3):672-95 - PubMed
    1. Eur Heart J. 1991 Mar;12(3):423-7 - PubMed

Publication types