Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1994 Dec;31(4):215-9.
doi: 10.1007/BF00571954.

Self-monitoring of blood glucose in overweight type 2 diabetic patients

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Self-monitoring of blood glucose in overweight type 2 diabetic patients

D B Muchmore et al. Acta Diabetol. 1994 Dec.

Abstract

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SBGM) is widely recommended for both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients despite the lack of evidence of benefit in glucose control or as an aid in weight loss in type 2 subjects. This study tested the hypothesis that combined use of SMBG and dietary carbohydrate (CHO) counting, using the blood monitoring results to shape dietary CHO quotas, is beneficial in managing type 2 diabetes. Twenty-three overweight (body mass index, BMI 27.5-44 kg/m2) patients aged 40-75 participated in a 28-week behavioral weight control program. Baseline hemoglobin HbA1c ranged between 9.5% and 13.5% (normal range 5.5%-7.7%). Subjects were matched for weight, sex, and HbA1c and assigned to small (4-8 participants) groups which met weekly for 12 weeks and then monthly for 16 weeks. After 8 weeks, the groups were randomized either to continue the behavioral program or to have SMBG and dietary CHO counting. Glucose monitoring was performed 6 times daily (pre- and 2 h postprandially) for the first month, focusing on the meal increment and correlating this to dietary CHO intake. Weight loss was identical in both groups during the year of follow-up. The HbA1c level showed a progressive decline in experimental subjects (P < 0.05), whereas there was no improvement in control subjects.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Diabetes Care. 1987 Jan-Feb;10(1):95-9 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Care. 1988 Oct;11(9):725-32 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1992 Dec;8(4):287-338 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Care. 1990 Oct;13(10):1044-50 - PubMed
    1. Prim Care. 1988 Jun;15(2):389-408 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources