Methods and consequences of changes in use of episiotomy
- PMID: 7888844
- PMCID: PMC2541821
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1255
Methods and consequences of changes in use of episiotomy
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the use of feedback by graphical profiles of rates of episiotomy and the impact on clinical practice and perineal state after spontaneous vaginal deliveries assisted by midwives with different attitudes towards episiotomy.
Design: Observation period in labour ward followed by feedback to midwives about their own and other midwives' use of episiotomies. The periods before and after the intervention were compared.
Subjects: All women (n = 3919) delivering during the two periods who had been assisted by one of 30 midwives; each midwife supervised at least 20 deliveries during each period.
Main outcome measures: Overall rates of episiotomies and indications, incidence of intact perineums, perineal lacerations, and tears of anal sphincter.
Results: The overall rate of episiotomy during the observation period was 37.1% (615). During the second period the rate was 6.6% lower (95% confidence interval 3.6% to 9.6%), corresponding to a relative decrease of 17.8% (10.1% to 24.7%). Higher rates of episiotomy during the observation period were associated with larger reductions in the second period. The decrease could be explained by less use of episiotomy in deliveries with rigid perineum or impending perineal tear. Compared with the observation period, in the second period 3.2% more women (0.3% to 6.3%) had an intact perineum after delivery and 3.4% (0.4% to 6.2%) experienced perineal tears. The overall incidence of tears of the anal sphincter remained unchanged. Women had a slightly reduced incidence of tears of the anal sphincter, however, if they were delivered by midwives who reduced a medium or high initial rate of episiotomy and a tendency towards an increased incidence of tears if they were assisted by midwives who reduced low initial rates (around 20%) of episiotomy.
Conclusions: Changes in the use of episiotomy induced by awareness of clinical practice among midwives seem to increase the incidence of parturients with intact perineum without a concomitant rise in tears of the anal sphincter. To avoid the increase of such tears these changes should probably be restricted to midwives with rates of episiotomies above 30%.
Comment in
-
Rates of episiotomy. Conclusions and validity of data cannot be judged.BMJ. 1995 Mar 11;310(6980):668-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6980.668a. BMJ. 1995. PMID: 7703782 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Rates of episiotomy. Data on parity are not given.BMJ. 1995 Mar 11;310(6980):668; author reply 668-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6980.668. BMJ. 1995. PMID: 7755783 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[Changes in the use of episiotomy--methods and consequences].Ugeskr Laeger. 1995 Oct 2;157(40):5525-9. Ugeskr Laeger. 1995. PMID: 7571093 Danish.
-
[Episiotomy and perineal lesions in spontaneous vaginal delivery].Ugeskr Laeger. 1994 May 23;156(21):3176-9. Ugeskr Laeger. 1994. PMID: 8066836 Danish.
-
Impact of a selective use of episiotomy combined with Couder's maneuver for the perineal protection.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;302(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05572-9. Epub 2020 May 9. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020. PMID: 32388778
-
[Perineal tears and episiotomy: Surgical procedure - CNGOF perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics guidelines].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Dec;46(12):948-967. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.024. Epub 2018 Nov 2. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 30392991 Review. French.
-
[PERINEAL TEARS THAT INVOLVE THE ANAL SPHINCTER - IS IT AN UNPREVENTABLE OBSTETRIC PROBLEM AND WHAT ARE ITS REPRECUSSIONS?].Harefuah. 2018 Jun;157(6):378-382. Harefuah. 2018. PMID: 29964379 Review. Hebrew.
Cited by
-
Understanding the perspectives and values of midwives, obstetricians and obstetric registrars regarding episiotomy: qualitative interview study.BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):e037536. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037536. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33441351 Free PMC article.
-
Rates of episiotomy. Conclusions and validity of data cannot be judged.BMJ. 1995 Mar 11;310(6980):668-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6980.668a. BMJ. 1995. PMID: 7703782 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population-based study in France.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1747-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 29866103 Free PMC article.
-
Pelvic floor disorders 4 years after first delivery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomy.BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(2):247-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01540.x. Epub 2007 Oct 25. BJOG. 2008. PMID: 17970794 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Care in a midwife managed delivery unit. May not be the best option.BMJ. 1995 Mar 25;310(6982):805; author reply 807. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6982.805b. BMJ. 1995. PMID: 7711600 Free PMC article. No abstract available.