Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Jan;66(1):27-33.

[Surgical therapy of rectal prolapse using rectopexy and resection. Effect of resection treatment on postoperative constipation and sphincter muscle function--a follow-up study of 112 patients]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 7889787

[Surgical therapy of rectal prolapse using rectopexy and resection. Effect of resection treatment on postoperative constipation and sphincter muscle function--a follow-up study of 112 patients]

[Article in German]
S Athanasiadis et al. Chirurg. 1995 Jan.

Abstract

Between 1985 and 1991, 112 patients underwent posterior abdominal rectopexy (n = 59 Ivalon sponge, n = 53 Vicryl-rectopexy) for complete rectal prolapse. The follow-up period was 3 months to 9 1/2 years. 25 patients with severe constipation and rectal prolapse were treated by rectopexy combined with colectomy (left colectomy n = 18, sigmoidectomy n = 3, ileo-sigmoidostomy n = 4). Left colectomy combined with Ivalon or Vicryl-rectopexy does not seem to increase operative and postoperative morbidity but tends to diminish constipation in 84% of patients. There were no complications attributable to bowel resection or anastomosis. Following abdominal rectopexy without resection constipation was reduced 7.5% only, the bowel function was unchanged in 69% and obstipation was improved after the operation in 23%. In the group of patients without evident constipation (n = 74) treated with synchrone resection has no benefit with regard to the new occurred constipation, recurrence prolapse and continence ability. Infection around the prosthesis developed in 1.5% in the resection group, and in 2.1% in the rectopexy alone group. The prolapse recurrence rate was 2.6%. Conclusion. Resection in conjunction with abdominal rectopexy tends to diminish postoperative constipation does not seem to increase operative morbidity, and is indicated in patients with constipation only.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources