Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Jan;57(1):27-32.
doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90360-3.

Impact of internal mammary artery conduits on operative mortality in coronary revascularization

Affiliations

Impact of internal mammary artery conduits on operative mortality in coronary revascularization

F H Edwards et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 Jan.

Abstract

The long-term advantages of internal mammary artery (IMA) conduits in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures are widely recognized, but the immediate short-term impact of IMA grafts is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of IMA conduits on CABG operative mortality (OM). A retrospective study of two groups of patients undergoing isolated CABG was performed. Patients having at least one IMA graft (group 1) were compared with those with only venous conduits (group 2). The patient population was taken from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database, which contains a broad multi-institutional experience. A total of 38,578 registered patients undergoing isolated CABG from 1987 through 1991 were studied. Of these, 18,614 patients had at least one IMA conduit (group 1), whereas 19,964 had CABG using entirely venous conduits (group 2). The OM for group 1 was 2.0% (365/18,614), whereas the mortality was 4.5% (903/19,964) for group 2 (p < 0.005). Patient subgroups were examined to determine if the improved OM associated with IMA grafting was present in these patient subsets. The population was broken down according to age, sex, ejection fraction, extent of coronary disease, and operative priority. For each subset, univariate analysis showed that group 1 OM was significantly less (p < 0.005) than the OM for group 2. Numerous combinations of these patient parameters were also analyzed. Group 1 patients had a significant (p < 0.05) improvement in OM in each combination except for patients more than 70 years of age requiring reoperations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources