Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Jan 15;152(2):405-12.

Effect of anti-CD4 on CD4 subsets. I. Anti-CD4 preferentially deletes resting, naive CD4 cells and spares activated CD4 cells

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7904288

Effect of anti-CD4 on CD4 subsets. I. Anti-CD4 preferentially deletes resting, naive CD4 cells and spares activated CD4 cells

J H Chace et al. J Immunol. .

Abstract

Anti-CD4 has been extensively studied in murine models of autoimmunity and transplantation. The timing of anti-CD4 administration in these systems is critical because anti-CD4 effectively blocks primary T-dependent responses but does not diminish ongoing or memory responses in immunized animals. These differential effects suggest that anti-CD4 suppresses a subpopulation of CD4+ cells. We previously observed in vitro that simultaneous activation through TCR-T3 rescued CD4+ cells from anti-CD4 elimination. From this we hypothesized that activated CD4+ cells resisted the effects of anti-CD4. We now show that in vivo treatment with anti-CD4 preferentially eliminated resting, naive CD4+ cells rather than memory and effector CD4+ cells. The CD4+ cells that remained after anti-CD4 treatment exhibited evidence of recent activation, because a higher percentage expressed IL-2R, regardless of subset phenotype. Moreover, Mls-1-primed, anti-CD4-treated mice showed a higher percentage of V beta 6+ (Mls-1 reactive) CD4+ cells than either unprimed mice, anti-CD4-treated mice, or Mls-1-primed controls, implicating the importance of recent activation. These anti-CD4-resistant cells also retained their functional abilities. T cells from BALB/c mice treated with anti-CD4 after Mls-1 immunization maintained their MLR proliferation against DBA/2 stimulator cells. In addition, anti-CD4 did not reduce T-dependent antibody responses in mice previously primed against the Ag cholera toxin or SRBC. Thus, activated CD4+ cells resist the suppressive effects of anti-CD4. Our findings have critical implications for the ongoing clinical trials using anti-CD4.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources