[Viable bacterial counts by agar-droplet technique (author's transl)]
- PMID: 790859
[Viable bacterial counts by agar-droplet technique (author's transl)]
Abstract
This paper deals with 1) Analysis of the agar droplet technique for viable bacterial counts with respect to a new technical aid (Colworth DROPLETTETM); 2) Comparison of the results obtained from two conventional plate count techniques and the agar-droplet method; 3) Examples for the practical use of this new technique. As a helpful aid for the agar-droplet technique there now exists an apparatus (Colworth DROPLETTETM, Fig.1) which facilitates dilution and dispension of bacteria containing agar, as well as counting of colonies grown in agar droplets. Precision and reproducibility of the diluter/dispenser was found to be within the limits of the usual sampling error (Tab.1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3). The visibility of colonies grown in agar droplets is improved by a ten-fold enlargement on the ground glass screen of the viewer (Fig. 7). In order to obtain droplets of equal size a standardised dropping-technique is required. The fluid agar must not exceed a constant temperature of 50 degrees C as otherwise four of the five species tested (Staph. aureus, E. coli, Kl. aerogenes, Ps. aeruginosa and Enterococci) were significantly reduced in number during the manipulation (Fig. 4, Fig. 5). Agar droplet technique, flooding technique and pour plates gave similar results with gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria from medical routine materials. Comparing the arithmetic means, viable counts of Staph. aureus were slightly higher from pour plates while E. coli and Kl. aerogenes gave the highest counts on flooded plates (Tab. 8-11). All of the three methods produced relatively too low counts when the number of bacteria per sample surmounted 300. Counts below 10 allow only a very poor estimation of the actual number of bacteria (Tab. 12). The variability of droplet counts with bacterial numbers higher than 25 was less then the one of corresponding plate counts (Tab. 14-16). Significant savings in materials, labour and incubator space are made with the agar droplet method. As examples for the practical use of the new method the results of the kinetics of thermally inactivated as well as of growing bacteria are presented.
Similar articles
-
[Assessment of bacterial counts in the meat-processing industry. II. The plate-loop method and the droplet method (author's transl)].Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1977 Aug 15;102(16):975-82. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1977. PMID: 329470 Dutch.
-
Rapid surface colony counts determination with three new miniaturised techniques.Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1977;237(2-3):415-23. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1977. PMID: 322428
-
[A simple wash technic for the recovery of test pathogens in the evaluation of surface disinfection procedures].Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1984 May;179(2):112-24. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1984. PMID: 6377750 German.
-
Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.Food Microbiol. 2006 Feb;23(1):1-38. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2005.01.010. Food Microbiol. 2006. PMID: 16942983 Review.
-
Heterotrophic plate count methodology in the United States.Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 May 1;92(3):307-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.08.008. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15145589 Review.
Cited by
-
Enumeration of micro-organisms in food: a comparative study of five methods.J Hyg (Lond). 1978 Aug;81(1):151-9. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400053857. J Hyg (Lond). 1978. PMID: 690422 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials