Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1994 Jun;22(6):945-8.
doi: 10.1097/00003246-199406000-00011.

Equivalence of litmus paper and intragastric pH probes for intragastric pH monitoring in the intensive care unit

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Equivalence of litmus paper and intragastric pH probes for intragastric pH monitoring in the intensive care unit

R L Levine et al. Crit Care Med. 1994 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy of litmus paper-determined gastric pH to a nasogastric graphite antimony pH probe.

Design: A prospective clinical trial of gastric pH determination in patients enrolled in a study of histamine-2-receptor (H2) antagonists.

Setting: The medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a 450-bed county hospital.

Patients: Critically ill ICU patients requiring stress ulcer prophylaxis.

Interventions: Using a crossover design, the patients were randomized to initially receive an H2 antagonist by continuous infusion or intravenous bolus, and subsequently were crossed over to the other limb of the study.

Measurements and main results: Gastric pH was determined using pH-sensitive litmus paper at the initiation of each limb of the study and at 1, 2, 4, and 8 hrs after the initiation of H2 receptor antagonist therapy. In addition, gastric pH was continuously determined over the same time period utilizing a graphite antimony pH probe. Gastric pH measurements determined with litmus paper and intragastric pH probes demonstrated an excellent correlation (r2 = .93, p < .001). McNemar's test of correlated proportions could not demonstrate a significant difference between the two monitoring methods (chi-square = 0.5, p > .47), and the kappa statistic (0.95, p < .001) demonstrated excellent concordance. Bias measurement was 0.01 (95% confidence interval = -0.155 to 0.176).

Conclusions: Measurement of intragastric pH, using pH-sensitive litmus paper, is both sensitive and specific when utilizing a graphite antimony nasogastric pH probe as a reference standard. Litmus paper-determined gastric pH testing is both easy to perform and inexpensive. Therefore, based on the current data, we believe this technique (i.e., litmus paper determined gastric pH testing) to be the method of choice for determination of intragastric pH in patients at risk for stress gastric ulcers in the medical ICU.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources