This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 1994 Jul 2;344(8914):69.

doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91096-0.

How should we measure carotid stenosis?

C F Bladin, A V Alexandrov, J W Norris

PMID: 7912345
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91096-0

Comment

How should we measure carotid stenosis?

C F Bladin et al. Lancet. 1994.

. 1994 Jul 2;344(8914):69.

doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91096-0.

Authors

C F Bladin, A V Alexandrov, J W Norris

PMID: 7912345
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91096-0

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Measurement of carotid stenosis.
Altman DG. Altman DG. Lancet. 1994 Sep 10;344(8924):749; author reply 750. Lancet. 1994. PMID: 7915792 No abstract available.
Measurement of carotid stenosis.
Rothwell PM, Slattery J, Warlow CP. Rothwell PM, et al. Lancet. 1994 Sep 10;344(8924):749-50. Lancet. 1994. PMID: 7915793 No abstract available.

Comment on

MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Lancet. 1991 May 25;337(8752):1235-43. Lancet. 1991. PMID: 1674060 Clinical Trial.

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Elsevier Science
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.