Cervical discography in discogenic pain syndrome and its predictive value for cervical fusion
- PMID: 7917712
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00441832
Cervical discography in discogenic pain syndrome and its predictive value for cervical fusion
Abstract
We have reviewed 27 patients who underwent fusion of a total of 39 cervical levels for discogenic pain syndrome. All patients were diagnosed by positive discography defined as provocation of their characteristic pain on a Adams type 3-5 contrast distribution pattern. The mean age of the patients was 46.4 years and the follow-up averaged 16.2 months (range 9-42 months). Fusion was performed through a ventral approach with the use of an iliac bone graft in all patients. There were 22 one-level, 7 two-level and 1 three-level fusions. Overall 19 patients (73%) had good to excellent results according to the criteria of Simmons and Segil. Six patients (23%) had a fair outcome and one (3.8%) a poor result. More good to excellent results (85.7%) were seen after two-level fusions than after one-level fusions (61.9%). Patients presenting with pain radiation to the upper limbs had a more favorable outcome. Better results also were found in patients with pain onset after cervical spine trauma than those without. However, due to the limited number of patients in this group, differences did not reach statistically significant levels. Reported postoperative results in the literature in similar patient groups without preoperative evaluation of the symptomatic level by discography show a good to excellent outcome in a less favorable range of 35%-46%.
Similar articles
-
[The value of diskography in disk-related pain syndrome of the cervical spine for evaluation of indications for spondylodesis].Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1993 May-Jun;131(3):220-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1040231. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1993. PMID: 8342306 German.
-
Cervical discogenic syndrome. Results of operative intervention in patients with positive discography.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 May;12(4):313-6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987. PMID: 3616742
-
Diagnostic value of cervical discography in the management of cervical discogenic pain.Conn Med. 2000 Jul;64(7):395-8. Conn Med. 2000. PMID: 10946476
-
Value of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in determining the level of cervical discectomy and fusion.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 1;29(19):2140-5; discussion 2146. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000141172.99530.e0. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004. PMID: 15454705
-
Cervical discogenic syndrome: a cause of chronic head and neck pain.J Miss State Med Assoc. 1995 Aug;36(8):231-4. J Miss State Med Assoc. 1995. PMID: 7473695 Review.
Cited by
-
Cervical disc degeneration and neck pain.J Pain Res. 2018 Nov 14;11:2853-2857. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S180018. eCollection 2018. J Pain Res. 2018. PMID: 30532580 Free PMC article.
-
Deuk Laser Disc Repair(®) is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic cervical disc disease.Surg Neurol Int. 2013 May 28;4:68. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.112610. Print 2013. Surg Neurol Int. 2013. PMID: 23776754 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical diskography performed with a "prong deflector" for improved access to the cervical disk spaces.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 May;26(5):1004-7. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005. PMID: 15891152 Free PMC article.
-
The Positive Side Effect of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion on Axial Neck Pain.Global Spine J. 2025 Apr;15(3):1608-1613. doi: 10.1177/21925682241254036. Epub 2024 May 10. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 38729921 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility study of ultrasound-guided percutaneous laser discectomy for cervical radicular pain.Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 2;12(1):13285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17627-9. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35918378 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical