Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1994 Aug;41(8):667-72.
doi: 10.1007/BF03015618.

Can parturients distinguish between intravenous and epidural fentanyl?

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Can parturients distinguish between intravenous and epidural fentanyl?

G F Morris et al. Can J Anaesth. 1994 Aug.

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that the sedative, euphoric, and analgesic effects of intravenous fentanyl would distinguish intravenous from epidural administration. One hundred ASA I and II labouring parturients received 100 micrograms fentanyl either iv or via an epidural catheter in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over fashion. Nineteen anaesthetists (8 staff and 11 residents) participated and correctly guessed the route of administration of the fentanyl in 61/66 intravenous doses and in 69/75 epidural doses yielding a sensitivity of 92.4%, a specificity of 92.0%, a positive predictive value of 91.0%, and a negative predictive value of 93.2%. Of the 41 patients that were crossed over, 38 (92.7%) were able to detect a difference between the routes of administration. Most patients experienced prompt, short-lived symptoms with iv fentanyl but no important differences in fetal heart rate pattern or in maternal desaturation were seen between the groups. This study suggests that subjective symptoms will accurately distinguish intravenous from epidural fentanyl administration in labouring parturients (P < 0.001), and should serve as a safe and reliable intravenous test dose for epidural anaesthesia in the obstetric population.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Reg Anesth. 1990 Jan-Feb;15(1):15-8 - PubMed
    1. Can J Anaesth. 1987 Nov;34(6):545-8 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 1984 Jan;60(1):3-5 - PubMed
    1. Can J Anaesth. 1987 Nov;34(6):601-5 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 1986 Aug;65(2):226-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources