Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1994 May;20(5):328-34.
doi: 10.1007/BF01720904.

HA-1A in septic patients with ARDS: results from the pivotal trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

HA-1A in septic patients with ARDS: results from the pivotal trial

L M Bigatello et al. Intensive Care Med. 1994 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of HA-1A, a human monoclonal antiendotoxin antibody, in septic patients with ARDS.

Design: Substudy of a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of HA-1A in septic patients.

Patients: 63 septic patients with ARDS at the time of study entry.

Intervention: A single intravenous injection of HA-1A (100 mg) or placebo.

Results: A quantitative radiographic score, the PaO2/FIO2 ratio and an index of the severity of ARDS did not show a significant difference between the treatment and placebo groups at 3, 5 and 7 days after treatment. The duration of endotracheal intubation did not differ between the two groups. 15 of 30 HA-1A treated patients (50%) and 23 of 33 placebo-treated patients (69.7%) died within 28 days. The daily mortality was always lower in the HA-1A group, but this difference was not statistically significant at 28 days. The 28-day survival curves for the two treatment groups adjusted by covariate analysis were not significantly different (p = 0.07). Using logistic regression, a significant independent effect of HA-1A treatment was detected upon the early survival rate at 7 days (p = 0.03) but not at 14 and 28 days.

Conclusion: A single injection of HA-1A in septic patients with ARDS did not reverse acute respiratory failure or improve long-term survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986 May;133(5):913-27 - PubMed
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985 Sep;132(3):485-9 - PubMed
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Sep;138(3):720-3 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Mar;148(3):501-8 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1991 Sep 25;266(12):1686-91 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources