Adjuvant CMFVP versus tamoxifen versus concurrent CMFVP and tamoxifen for postmenopausal, node-positive, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study
- PMID: 7931477
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.10.2078
Adjuvant CMFVP versus tamoxifen versus concurrent CMFVP and tamoxifen for postmenopausal, node-positive, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study
Abstract
Purpose: To compare chemohormonal therapy, chemotherapy alone, and hormonal therapy alone in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes with respect to survival and disease-free survival (DFS).
Patients and methods: Eight hundred ninety-two postmenopausal women with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) from July 1979 to March 1989 and 74 by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) between June 1987 and March 1989. Patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive the following: (1) tamoxifen 10 mg twice daily by mouth for 1 year; (2) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m2 IV weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone during weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 2.5 mg/m2 (CMFVP); or (3) the combination of tamoxifen and CMFVP.
Results: The median follow-up duration is 6.5 years, with a maximum of 12.8 years. Treatment arms are not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (log-rank, 2 df, P = .82 and .23, respectively). The 5-year survival rate is 77% for the tamoxifen arm, 78% for CMFVP, and 75% for the combination. No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets. Severe or worse toxicity was experienced by 56% of patients on CMFVP and 61% on CMFVP plus tamoxifen, compared with 5% on tamoxifen alone.
Conclusion: CMFVP chemotherapy, either alone or in combination with tamoxifen, has not been shown to be superior to tamoxifen alone in the treatment of postmenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer.
Comment in
-
Regarding the dilemma of adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal patients with node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: are we better informed?J Clin Oncol. 1995 Apr;13(4):1044-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.4.1044. J Clin Oncol. 1995. PMID: 7707102 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Adjuvant CMFVP versus adjuvant CMFVP plus ovariectomy for premenopausal, node-positive, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study.J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jan;14(1):46-51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.46. J Clin Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8558219 Clinical Trial.
-
One versus 2 years of CMFVP adjuvant chemotherapy in axillary node-positive and estrogen receptor-negative patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study.J Clin Oncol. 1993 Sep;11(9):1710-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.9.1710. J Clin Oncol. 1993. PMID: 8355037 Clinical Trial.
-
Adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil, vincristine, and prednisone compared with single-agent L-phenylalanine mustard for patients with operable breast carcinoma and positive axillary lymph nodes: 20-year results of a Southwest Oncology Group study.Cancer. 2003 Jan 1;97(1):21-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10982. Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12491501 Clinical Trial.
-
[No advantage to using the CMF-regimen for node positive, postmenopausal, receptor-positive mammary carcinoma with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy].Strahlenther Onkol. 1998 May;174(5):290-1. doi: 10.1007/BF03038727. Strahlenther Onkol. 1998. PMID: 9614963 Review. German. No abstract available.
-
Adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer: cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil dose and schedule may make a difference. International Breast Cancer Study Group.J Clin Oncol. 1998 Apr;16(4):1358-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.4.1358. J Clin Oncol. 1998. PMID: 9552037 Review.
Cited by
-
The Globalization of Cooperative Groups.Semin Oncol. 2015 Oct;42(5):693-712. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Jul 10. Semin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26433551 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Follow-up and management of valvular heart disease patients with prosthetic valve: a clinical practice guideline for Indian scenario.Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;35(Suppl 1):3-44. doi: 10.1007/s12055-019-00789-z. Epub 2019 Jan 28. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 33061064 Free PMC article.
-
Is adjuvant chemotherapy of benefit for postmenopausal women who receive endocrine treatment for highly endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer? International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VII and 12-93.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Aug;116(3):491-500. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0225-9. Epub 2008 Oct 25. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009. PMID: 18953651 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
High incidence of thromboembolic events in patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a large retrospective analysis.J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;29(25):3466-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.5669. Epub 2011 Aug 1. J Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21810688 Free PMC article.
-
Sex hormones, hormonal interventions, and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jan;21(1):20-38. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0834. Epub 2011 Oct 25. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012. PMID: 22028402 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous