Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Jul;31(4):571-85.
doi: 10.1093/jmedent/31.4.571.

Integrated management strategies for Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) on pastured beef cattle

Affiliations

Integrated management strategies for Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) on pastured beef cattle

D R Barnard et al. J Med Entomol. 1994 Jul.

Abstract

Data on tick control and knowledge of the damage caused to beef cattle by tick feeding were incorporated into a computerized dynamic life table model (LSTSIM) for Amblyomma americanum (L.). Simulations were made to determine economically feasible, 5-yr integrated pest management (IPM) strategies for A. americanum in forage areas utilized by Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and crossbred cattle (B. taurus x B. indicus). The effects of host resistance, pasture rotation, habitat conversion, topical acaricides, systemic acaricides, and the area-wide application of acaricides to pastures on populations of parasitic female ticks were simulated as individual control technologies and as components of multiple-factor IPM strategies. The most effective, single-factor control strategy for A. americanum in beef cattle forage areas is the use of tick-resistant B. indicus cattle. Pasture rotation combined with area-wide acaricide applications was the only economically feasible IPM strategy for B. indicus cattle and reduced tick densities by 89% after 5 yr. Thirteen economically feasible IPM strategies were identified for use with B. taurus cattle. Of these, the most efficacious was pasture rotation in May combined with systemic or topical acaricide applications. Other strategies included systemic acaricides with area-wide acaricide applications to pastures, topical acaricides with area-wide acaricide applications, pasture rotation with habitat conversion and topical acaricides, and pasture rotation with habitat conversion, topical acaricides, and area-wide acaricide applications. Each technology reduced tick densities on B. taurus cattle by > 80% over a 5-yr period. Nine IPM strategies were economically feasible for use with crossbred cattle. Of these, pasture rotation combined with systemic or topical acaricide applications reduced the number of female ticks on cattle by > 84%; pasture rotation combined with habitat conversion reduced tick numbers by 77%. The most effective nonacaricide-based IPM strategy for B. taurus and crossbred cattle was pasture rotation combined with habitat conversion. No acaricide-free IPM strategy was economically feasible for use with B. indicus cattle.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources