Comparison of antiparallel A.AT and T.AT triplets within an alternate strand DNA triple helix

Abstract

We have examined the formation of alternate strand triple-helices at the target sequence A11(TC)6.(GA)6T11 using the oligonucleotides T11(AG)6 and T11(TG)6, by DNase I footprinting. These third strands were designed so as to form parallel T.AT triplets together with antiparallel G.GC and A.AT or T.AT triplets. We find that, although both oligonucleotides yield clear footprints at similar concentrations (0.3 microM) in the presence of manganese, only T11(TG)6 forms a stable complex in magnesium-containing buffers, albeit at a higher concentration (10-30 microM). Examination of the interaction of (AG)6 and (TG)6 with half the target site confirmed that the complex containing A.AT triplets was only stable in the presence of manganese. In contrast no binding of (TG)6 was detected in the presence of either metal ion, suggesting that the reverse-Hoogsteen T.AT triplet is less stable that G.GC. We suggest that, within the context of G.GC triplets, the rank order of antiparallel triplet stability is A.AT (Mn2+) > T.AT (Mn2+) > T.AT (Mg2+) > A.AT (Mg2+). Third strands containing a single base substitution in the centre of either the parallel or antiparallel portion showed a (10-fold) weaker interaction in manganese-containing buffers, and no interaction in the presence of magnesium.