Fragile X founder chromosome effects: linkage disequilibrium or microsatellite heterogeneity?
- PMID: 7943008
- DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320510421
Fragile X founder chromosome effects: linkage disequilibrium or microsatellite heterogeneity?
Abstract
Previous studies of founder chromosome effects in fragile X have been based on linkage disequilibrium with either FRAXAC1 or DXS548 alone or combined with FRAXAC2. Recently, we found no linkage disequilibrium of FMR-1 with FRAXAC2, but rather, found FRAXAC2 was complex and highly mutable. Therefore, we have now analyzed FRAXAC1 and DXS548 together for haplotypes, two markers which have not been jointly analyzed previously, to test for disequilibrium. We typed 315 fragile X (FX) chromosomes and controls, further subdivided into large controls (LC) and small controls (SC) with < or = 35 repeats and identified 26 different haplotypes. Two were more frequent and one less frequent in FX than SCs, thus confirming apparent linkage disequilibrium in fragile X. However, we noted increased FX microsatellite heterozygosity, either individually (results quite similar to previous studies) or as haplotypes. This heterozygosity covaried with FX > LC > SC, which may indicate alternative explanation exists for the apparent disequilibrium. We hypothesize that large FMR-1 CGG repeat allele genes may be associated with the generation of new microsatellite mutations. Possible mechanisms include gene conversions between CGG repeats and flanking microsatellites involving unequal double cross-overs, the expansion of small control CGGs to larger sizes associated with episodic generalized microsatellite instability or as a direct result of mutant FMR-1 gene function. We conclude that the founder effects observed with the use of these CA repeats is likely to reflect both linkage disequilibrium and increased microsatellite instability of fragile X chromosomes.
Similar articles
-
Fragile X founder effects and new mutations in Finland.Am J Med Genet. 1996 Jul 12;64(1):226-33. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960712)64:1<226::AID-AJMG41>3.0.CO;2-M. Am J Med Genet. 1996. PMID: 8826481
-
Fragile X founder chromosomes in Italy: a few initial events and possible explanation for their heterogeneity.Am J Med Genet. 1996 Jul 12;64(1):209-15. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960712)64:1<209::AID-AJMG38>3.0.CO;2-P. Am J Med Genet. 1996. PMID: 8826478
-
A complex mutable polymorphism located within the fragile X gene.Nat Genet. 1993 Nov;5(3):248-53. doi: 10.1038/ng1193-248. Nat Genet. 1993. PMID: 8275089
-
[Molecular and genetic features of fragile X syndrome].Rev Med Chil. 1996 Jul;124(7):865-72. Rev Med Chil. 1996. PMID: 9138377 Review. Spanish.
-
Fragile X syndrome.Adv Pediatr. 1994;41:305-42. Adv Pediatr. 1994. PMID: 7992687 Review.
Cited by
-
Elevated FMR1 mRNA in premutation carriers is due to increased transcription.RNA. 2007 Apr;13(4):555-62. doi: 10.1261/rna.280807. Epub 2007 Feb 5. RNA. 2007. PMID: 17283214 Free PMC article.
-
Fragile X gene instability: anchoring AGGs and linked microsatellites.Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Aug;57(2):351-61. Am J Hum Genet. 1995. PMID: 7668261 Free PMC article.
-
Positive fragile X microsatellite associations point to a common mechanism of dynamic mutation evolution.Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Mar;58(3):641-3. Am J Hum Genet. 1996. PMID: 8644726 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Predisposition to the fragile X syndrome in Jews of Tunisian descent is due to the absence of AGG interruptions on a rare Mediterranean haplotype.Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Jan;60(1):103-12. Am J Hum Genet. 1997. PMID: 8981953 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical