A performance test protocol and scoring scale for the evaluation of ankle injuries
- PMID: 7943510
- DOI: 10.1177/036354659402200405
A performance test protocol and scoring scale for the evaluation of ankle injuries
Abstract
The aim of the study was to introduce and evaluate a standardized test protocol and scoring scale for evaluation of ankle injuries. After evaluation of 11 different functional ankle tests, questionnaire answers, and results of clinical ankle examination, the final test protocol consisted of 3 simple questions describing the subjective assessment of the injured ankle, 2 clinical measurements (range of motion in dorsiflexion, laxity of the ankle joint), 1 ankle test measuring functional stability (walking down a staircase), 2 tests measuring muscle strength (rising on heels and toes), and 1 test measuring balance (balancing on a square beam). Each selected test showed excellent reproducibility when tested with a reference group of 100 uninjured persons. According to the test results of a population of 148 patients with an operatively treated grade III lateral ligament injury of the ankle, each test could significantly differentiate healthy controls and patients with excellent overall healing from those with poor or fair recovery. The final total test score correlated significantly with the isokinetic strength results of the ankle, subjective opinion about the recovery, and subjective-functional assessment. The scale presented is recommended for studies evaluating functional recovery after ankle injury.
Similar articles
-
Effects of joint mobilization on chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial.Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):601-10. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.935877. Epub 2014 Jul 3. Disabil Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 24989067 Clinical Trial.
-
Reliability of a functional test battery evaluating functionality, proprioception, and strength in recreational athletes with functional ankle instability.Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008 Dec;44(4):407-15. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008. PMID: 19002090
-
Functional instability in non-contact ankle ligament injuries.Br J Sports Med. 2000 Oct;34(5):352-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.5.352. Br J Sports Med. 2000. PMID: 11049145 Free PMC article.
-
Current methods for the evaluation of ankle ligament injuries.Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:349-57. Instr Course Lect. 1995. PMID: 7797873 Review. No abstract available.
-
Ankle instability and arthroscopic lateral ligament repair.Foot Ankle Clin. 2015 Mar;20(1):59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Dec 15. Foot Ankle Clin. 2015. PMID: 25726483 Review.
Cited by
-
Post-traumatic missing medial malleolus: case report with a one-year follow-up.Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Dec;113:109083. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.109083. Epub 2023 Nov 22. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 38000142 Free PMC article.
-
Ground reaction force in basketball cutting maneuvers with and without ankle bracing and taping.Sao Paulo Med J. 2006 Sep 7;124(5):245-52. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802006000500002. Sao Paulo Med J. 2006. PMID: 17262153 Free PMC article.
-
The Swedish version of OMAS is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with ankle fractures.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Mar 25;14:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-109. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013. PMID: 23522388 Free PMC article.
-
The VISA-A questionnaire: a valid and reliable index of the clinical severity of Achilles tendinopathy.Br J Sports Med. 2001 Oct;35(5):335-41. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.35.5.335. Br J Sports Med. 2001. PMID: 11579069 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Readability of Orthopaedic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Is There a Fundamental Failure to Communicate?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug;475(8):1936-1947. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5339-0. Epub 2017 Apr 3. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 28374349 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical