Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians' attitudes, their inpatients' wishes, and reported experience
- PMID: 7944852
Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians' attitudes, their inpatients' wishes, and reported experience
Abstract
Background: The attitudes of hospitalized patients and their attending physicians about advance directives have not been well studied. We compared these attitudes and explored relationships between them and the frequency of actual directives and directive discussions during hospitalization.
Methods: We conducted scripted interviews with 258 (94.5%) of 273 patients admitted consecutively to the acute medical service of a community teaching hospital in Rochester, NY, and contemporaneously surveyed their attending physicians (n = 68) regarding attitudes about advance directives. Primary outcome measures were patients' willingness to discuss directives, actual physician-patient directive discussions, and patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatments. Also measured were physicians' indications for directive discussions, their reasons not to discuss directives, and their knowledge and attitudes about life-sustaining treatments.
Results: Eighty-one percent (172/212) of competent interviewed patients either did (100) or wanted to (72) discuss advance directives in hospital. Forty-one percent of patients chose to forgo cardiopulmonary resuscitation; 24% to 41% refused other life-sustaining interventions (intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, cardioversion, vasopressors). Overall, 90% (246/273) of all patients met at least one of three criteria reported by their physicians as indications for advance directive discussions: age at least 75 years, critical or potentially fatal illness, and patients' desire to discuss directives. Multiple logistic regression revealed that these same variables predicted patients' willingness to discuss cardiopulmonary resuscitation, their preferences to receive or forgo cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and the frequency of physician-patient discussions about these issues.
Conclusions: Most medical inpatients in a community hospital want to, are able to, and meet their own physicians' indications to discuss advance directives. Hospitalization presents an unrealized opportunity for physicians and patients to initiate these discussions.
Comment in
-
On advancing advance directives. Why should we believe the promise?Arch Intern Med. 1995 Nov 27;155(21):2271-3. Arch Intern Med. 1995. PMID: 7487250 Review. No abstract available.
-
Talking, advance directives, and medical practice.Arch Intern Med. 1994 Oct 24;154(20):2265-7. Arch Intern Med. 1994. PMID: 7944849 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Promoting inpatient directives about life-sustaining treatments in a community hospital. Results of a 3-year time-series intervention trial.Arch Intern Med. 1995 Nov 27;155(21):2317-23. Arch Intern Med. 1995. PMID: 7487256
-
Implementing advance directives in the primary care setting.Arch Intern Med. 1994 Oct 24;154(20):2321-7. Arch Intern Med. 1994. PMID: 7944854 Clinical Trial.
-
Physician reluctance to discuss advance directives. An empiric investigation of potential barriers.Arch Intern Med. 1994 Oct 24;154(20):2311-8. Arch Intern Med. 1994. PMID: 7944853
-
Discussions about the use of life-sustaining treatments: a literature review of physicians' and patients' attitudes and practices. End of Life Study Group.J Clin Ethics. 1994 Fall;5(3):195-203. J Clin Ethics. 1994. PMID: 7841468 Review. No abstract available.
-
Caring for older cancer patients: practical decision-making guidelines with a focus on advance directives.Oncology (Williston Park). 1992 Feb;6(2 Suppl):131-5. Oncology (Williston Park). 1992. PMID: 1532727 Review.
Cited by
-
Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care.Cancer. 2010 Feb 15;116(4):998-1006. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24761. Cancer. 2010. PMID: 20066693 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers to communication about end-of-life care in AIDS patients.J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Dec;12(12):736-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07158.x. J Gen Intern Med. 1997. PMID: 9436892 Free PMC article.
-
Physician-facilitated designation of proxy decision-makers: family physician perceptions.Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Apr 30;5:6. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0059-6. eCollection 2016. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016. PMID: 27134719 Free PMC article.
-
[Advance directives in clinical practice].Med Klin (Munich). 1999 Jul 15;94(7):398-405. doi: 10.1007/BF03044907. Med Klin (Munich). 1999. PMID: 10437373 Review. German.
-
What are cancer patients' preferences about treatment at the end of life, and who should start talking about it? A comparison with healthy people and medical staff.Support Care Cancer. 2005 Apr;13(4):206-14. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0725-z. Epub 2005 Jan 19. Support Care Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15657689
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous