Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1994 Spring;9(1):51-60.
doi: 10.1177/074873049400900105.

Differences in circadian photosensitivity between retinally degenerate CBA/J mice (rd/rd) and normal CBA/N mice (+/+)

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differences in circadian photosensitivity between retinally degenerate CBA/J mice (rd/rd) and normal CBA/N mice (+/+)

T Yoshimura et al. J Biol Rhythms. 1994 Spring.

Abstract

Using the magnitude of phase shift of circadian locomotor rhythms induced by a single pulse of white fluorescent light, we compared the sensitivity of the circadian system to light in retinally degenerate mice and in normal mice. In the first experiment, phase response curves (PRCs) for 10-lux white light were generated in CBA/J mice with retinal degeneration (rd/rd) and CBA/N mice with normal retinas (+/+). Although large phase delays early in the subjective night and small phase advances in the late subjective night were observed in CBA/N mice, CBA/J mice showed only small phase delays early in the subjective night. In the second experiment, we found that the magnitude of phase shifts at circadian time (CT) 16 for delays and CT 24 for advances in CBA/J mice became larger with increasing light intensity, and that CBA/J mice could show the same amount of phase shift as CBA/N mice when higher intensities were used. These findings indicate that the differences in the shapes of PRCs are not due to differences in the nature of the oscillating system, but to differences in circadian photosensitivity between these strains. Because the genetic background for the rd loci was not completely identical in the CBA/N and CBA/J mice, it was possible that genes other than the rd gene might have caused different photosensitivity in these mice. Therefore, in the last experiment, we studied the circadian photosensitivity in F1 hybrids between CBA/N and CBA/J mice and in the backcross progeny with different genotypes (+/rd and rd/rd) obtained from the crossing between F1 hybrids between CBA/N and CBA/J mice and in the backcross progeny with different genotypes (+/rd and rd/rd) obtained from the crossing between F1 and CBA/J mice. In these mice with heterogeneous genetic backgrounds as well, mice with retinal degeneration were always less sensitive to light, suggesting that reduced circadian photosensitivity is caused by retinal degeneration. These results are discussed in relation to recent findings in retinally degenerate C57BL mice, which have been found to have normal circadian sensitivity to light.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources