Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1994 Aug;8(4):388-95.

De novo cancer in cyclosporine-treated and non-cyclosporine-treated adult primary renal allograft recipients

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7949545
Comparative Study

De novo cancer in cyclosporine-treated and non-cyclosporine-treated adult primary renal allograft recipients

S A Gruber et al. Clin Transplant. 1994 Aug.

Abstract

We compared the incidence of de novo tumors developing in 1165 primary adult renal allograft recipients treated with azathioprine (AZA)-prednisone (Pred)-antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) (CONV group) with that in 722 patients receiving cyclosporine (CSA) as part of double (CSA-Pred), triple (CSA-Pred-AZA), or quadruple-therapy (CSA-Pred-AZA-ALG) protocols. Mean +/- SD follow-up was 9.5 +/- 6.4 years for the CONV group and 6.2 +/- 2.7 years for the CSA group. Overall, 124 patients (10.6%) in the CONV group and 34 patients (4.7%) in the CSA group developed malignancies, with nonmelanoma skin cancers and lymphomas comprising 55% and 13% of cancers in the CONV group and 65% and 3% of cancers in the CSA group, respectively. There were no significant differences in overall cancer (p = 0.41) or skin cancer (p = 0.97) incidence between non-CSA-treated and CSA-treated patients by Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis; however, CONV-treated patients demonstrated a higher incidence of lymphoma (p = 0.05). The mean (+/- SD) time to overall and skin cancer occurrence was significantly shorter in the CSA group: 37 +/- 22 versus 90 +/- 52 months (p < 0.001) and 40 +/- 24 versus 92 +/- 52 months, respectively. When the Cox Proportional Hazard Model was utilized to assess the relative importance of age, diabetic status, donor source, sex, and immunosuppressive regimen in determining cancer development, age > or = 50 years and nondiabetic status were significant independent prognostic indicators, while immunosuppressive regimen was not. Graft and patient survival were significantly greater in CONV-treated patients developing cancer than in those who did not.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources