Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1994 Aug;91(4):507-11.

[Reasons for the explantation of posterior chamber lenses]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 7950124
Comparative Study

[Reasons for the explantation of posterior chamber lenses]

[Article in German]
G U Auffarth et al. Ophthalmologe. 1994 Aug.

Abstract

In this study we analysed the overall incidence and the types of complications seen after cataract surgery and implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PC-IOLs) based on a review of 1460 explanted PC-IOLs. Of these explanted PC-IOLs, 1072 (73.4%) were three-piece PMMA IOLs with Prolene haptics, 261 (17.9%) were one-piece all-PMMA IOLs, 81 (5.6%) were silicone IOLs and 46 (3.1%) were of various other designs (multifocal IOLs, disc IOLs etc.). The mean implant duration for all IOLs was 25.57 +/- 29.24 months. The two most important reasons for explantation were IOL decentration (622/1460, 42.6%) and inflammation (347/1460, 23.77%). There was no difference in reasons for explantation between one-piece and three-piece IOLs. Operative techniques such as "can opener" capsulotomy and sulcus fixation have more influence on IOL decentration than the IOL design alone. Modern operative techniques such as continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification and symmetrical in-the-bag fixation of "capsular IOLs" should decrease the explantation and complication rate in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources