Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Sep 17;309(6956):691-5.

Progressive loss of bone in the femoral neck in elderly people: longitudinal findings from the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study

Affiliations

Progressive loss of bone in the femoral neck in elderly people: longitudinal findings from the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study

G Jones et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To determine prospectively the rates of change in bone mineral density in elderly people and to examine the relation between lifestyle and demographic factors and these rates of change.

Design: Longitudinal population based study.

Setting: Dubbo, New South Wales, Australia.

Subjects: Representative sample (n = 769) of residents aged > or = 60 on 1 January 1989.

Main outcome measure: Rates of change in bone mineral density measured prospectively (mean scan interval 2.5 years) at the femoral neck and lumbar spine by dual energy x ray absorptiometry.

Results: Summary rates of loss in the femoral neck were 0.96% per year (95% confidence interval 0.64% to 1.28%) in women and 0.82% per year (0.52% to 1.12%) in men. Importantly, rates of loss at the femoral neck (both percentage and absolute) increased in both sexes with advancing age. No significant loss was evident in either sex at the lumbar spine, probably because of coexistent osteoarthritis. Lifestyle factors had only modest effects on rates of loss at either site.

Conclusions: These data show that bone density of the femoral neck declines at an increasing rate in elderly people, and as this site is predictive of fracture suggest that treatment to minimise bone loss may be important even in very elderly people.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Intern Med. 1976 Mar;136(3):298-304 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1994 Jan 20;367(6460):284-7 - PubMed
    1. Clin Sci (Lond). 1982 Mar;62(3):329-36 - PubMed
    1. J Chronic Dis. 1982;35(9):715-25 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1985 Jan;78(1):95-100 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms