Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Nov:(308):8-17.

Surgical treatment of recurrent dislocation of the patella

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7955706

Surgical treatment of recurrent dislocation of the patella

P Aglietti et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Nov.

Abstract

Sixty-seven patients (69 knees) with recurrent patellar dislocation underwent either a lateral release (20 knees), a proximal realignment (14 knees), a distal realignment (16 knees), or a combined realignment (19 knees) procedure. Average respective followup was 8, 8, 6, and 4 years. Patients undergoing lateral release experienced a 40% recurrence of patellar dislocation. After a realignment procedure, redislocation was uncommon (4%), but pain and swelling were reported by 12% of the patients. Significant patellofemoral crepitation was present in 35% of the realignments. The congruence angle was corrected satisfactorily in the proximal realignments, but it remained abnormal in 25% of the distal realignments. The distance from the tuberosity to the sulcus was restored to normal by transposition of the tibial tuberosity, but remained abnormal in 36% of the proximal realignments. However, it did not preclude a good clinical result. Lateral release cannot be recommended for knees with severe dysplasia of the extensor mechanism. Proximal, distal, and combined realignments yielded similar clinical results. Retensioning of the medial structures and lateral release are effective in reducing the patella within the sulcus. Although transposition of the tuberosity is appealing, clinical advantages are less evident.

PubMed Disclaimer