Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994;86(1):47-53.
doi: 10.1007/BF01224627.

Binocular enhancement of the visual evoked potential in patients with Duane's syndrome

Affiliations

Binocular enhancement of the visual evoked potential in patients with Duane's syndrome

J J Sloper et al. Doc Ophthalmol. 1994.

Abstract

Monocular and binocular visual evoked potentials were recorded in eight patients with Duane's syndrome who used an abnormal head posture to maintain binocular single vision. With their abnormal head posture, all patients had stereoscopic vision, although with mildly reduced stereoacuity, and the visual evoked potential showed binocular enhancement (mean binocular to monocular ratio, 1.44). Without their head posture, the patients experienced diplopia or suppressed vision in one eye. Binocular visual evoked potentials recorded under these conditions were of lower amplitude (mean binocular to monocular ratio, 1.05). However, without the abnormal head posture, a manifest strabismus was present and the deviating eye was not fixating the stimulus screen. Monocular visual evoked potentials recorded with the eye fixating just to one side of the screen gave little or no response, and this lack of fixation may account for the loss of binocular enhancement of the visual evoked potential in strabismus.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1979;99(3):386-90 - PubMed
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974 Mar;58(3):293-300 - PubMed
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 Sep;100(9):1468-72 - PubMed
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996 Oct;114(10):1255-6; discussion 1257 - PubMed