Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Oct;85(10):1050-6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1994.tb02905.x.

In vitro and in vivo effects of cisplatin and etoposide in combination on small cell lung cancer cell lines

Affiliations

In vitro and in vivo effects of cisplatin and etoposide in combination on small cell lung cancer cell lines

H Kondo et al. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1994 Oct.

Abstract

The effects of cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (ETP) in combination were evaluated in vitro and in vivo using small cell lung cancer cell lines. The combination effects in vitro were investigated using isobologram analysis. Used together, CDDP and ETP showed a synergistic effect against cell growth on only 1 cell line (SBC-3), additive effects on 6 (SBC-2, SBC-5, Lu130, Lu134AH, Lu135T and H69) and an antagonistic effect on 1 (SBC-1). In the in vivo experiment, nude mice were inoculated with SBC-1, SBC-3 and SBC-5 cells. Two or 5 mg/kg CDDP and 10 or 30 mg/kg ETP were administered intraperitoneally alone and simultaneously in combination to nude mice. The in vivo effects of the combination were determined by comparing the observed growth ratio in mice treated with the combination with the expected value of this ratio calculated based on the assumption that the effects of the drugs were simply additive. According to this definition, synergistic effects were observed against all 3 tumors. Thus, the in vivo and in vitro effects differed. The toxicity of the combination therapy, which was analyzed by estimating the body weight change of mice, was no higher than that of CDDP or ETP alone. These results suggest that the excellent clinical effects of CDDP and ETP combination therapy may be attributable not to drug interaction at the cellular level but to the feasibility of combined use of them at full doses without overlapping side effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ) Einhorn , L. H.Initial therapy with cisplatin plus VP‐16 in small‐cell lung cancer . Semin. Oncol , 13 ( Suppl. 3 ), 5 – 9 ( 1986. ). - PubMed
    1. ) Loehrer , P. J. , Einhorn , L. H. and Greco , F. A.Cisplatin plus etoposide in small cell lung cancer . Semin. Oncol. , 15 ( Suppl. 3 ), 2 – 8 ( 1988. ). - PubMed
    1. ) Von Heyden , H. W. , Scherpe , A. and Nagel , G A.cis‐Dichlorodiammineplatinum (II) (cis‐platinum) and etoposide for patients with refractory lymphomas . Cancer Treat Rev. , 9 ( Suppl. A ), 45 – 52 ( 1987. ). - PubMed
    1. ) Hainsworth , J. D. , Williams , S. D. , Einhorn , L. H. , Birch , R. and Greco , F.Successful treatment of resistant germinal neoplasms with VP‐16 and cisplatin , J. Clin. Oncol. , 3 , 666 – 671 ( 1985. ). - PubMed
    1. ) Mosmann , T.Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application of proliferation and cytotoxicity assays . J. Immunol. Methods , 65 , 55 – 63 ( 1983. ). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources