Tactile defensiveness in children with developmental disabilities: responsiveness and habituation
- PMID: 7961330
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02172128
Tactile defensiveness in children with developmental disabilities: responsiveness and habituation
Abstract
Tactile defensiveness (TD) is characterized by behaviors such as rubbing, scratching, negative expressions, withdrawal, or avoidance in response to tactile stimulation. An inhibition deficit has been implied in the literature and is the focus of this study. School-aged children with developmental disabilities were first assessed for level of TD using three measures. Later, the children were presented with a repeated tactile stimulus while engaged in a computer game. Intensity, duration, and latency of the responses were recorded on each trial. It was hypothesized that higher levels of TD would be associated with (a) greater responsiveness and (b) slower habituation rates to the tactile stimulus. Correlations of three separate TD measures and a series of 3 x 10 (Level of TD by Responsiveness across trials) repeated measures ANOVAs were used to test the two hypotheses. Children who demonstrated higher levels of TD on some of the preliminary measures also showed higher responsiveness in the experimental situation. There was no general habituation effect, and the limited group by trials interactions were not interpretable. We conclude that there is evidence for a differential sensitivity in TD, but not an inhibition deficit. Another significant finding included a negative correlation between TD and developmental age.
Similar articles
-
Tactile defensiveness and stereotyped behaviors.Am J Occup Ther. 1997 Feb;51(2):91-5. doi: 10.5014/ajot.51.2.91. Am J Occup Ther. 1997. PMID: 9124275
-
Somatosensory function in boys with ADHD and tactile defensiveness.Physiol Behav. 2007 Mar 16;90(4):553-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.11.004. Epub 2007 Jan 2. Physiol Behav. 2007. PMID: 17198716
-
Self-reported Pleasantness Ratings and Examiner-Coded Defensiveness in Response to Touch in Children with ASD: Effects of Stimulus Material and Bodily Location.J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 May;46(5):1528-37. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1961-1. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016. PMID: 24091471 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral responses to tactile stimuli in children with cerebral palsy.Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2003;23(1):43-62. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2003. PMID: 12703384 Review.
-
Self-concept research with school-aged youth with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review.J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 Mar;32(2):238-255. doi: 10.1111/jar.12543. Epub 2018 Dec 5. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019. PMID: 30515961
Cited by
-
Measuring oral sensitivity in clinical practice: a quick and reliable behavioural method.Dysphagia. 2013 Dec;28(4):501-10. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9460-2. Epub 2013 Mar 21. Dysphagia. 2013. PMID: 23515637
-
Timing of moderate level prenatal alcohol exposure influences gene expression of sensory processing behavior in rhesus monkeys.Front Integr Neurosci. 2009 Nov 10;3:30. doi: 10.3389/neuro.07.030.2009. eCollection 2009. Front Integr Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19936317 Free PMC article.
-
Sensory over-responsivity: parent report, direct assessment measures, and neural architecture.Mol Autism. 2019 Feb 4;10:4. doi: 10.1186/s13229-019-0255-7. eCollection 2019. Mol Autism. 2019. PMID: 30740199 Free PMC article.
-
Increased pain sensitivity and pain-related anxiety in individuals with autism.Pain Rep. 2020 Nov 16;5(6):e861. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000861. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec. Pain Rep. 2020. PMID: 33235944 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in temporal profile of brain responses by pleasantness of somatosensory stimulation in autistic individuals.Somatosens Mot Res. 2025 Mar;42(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2023.2294715. Epub 2023 Dec 23. Somatosens Mot Res. 2025. PMID: 38140831