Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1994 Oct;47(10):900-5.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.10.900.

Comparison of new immunohistochemical assay for oestrogen receptor in paraffin wax embedded breast carcinoma tissue with quantitative enzyme immunoassay

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of new immunohistochemical assay for oestrogen receptor in paraffin wax embedded breast carcinoma tissue with quantitative enzyme immunoassay

G Saccani Jotti et al. J Clin Pathol. 1994 Oct.

Abstract

Aim: To validate the use of a new mouse monoclonal antibody (1D5) directed against the N-terminal domain (A/B region) of the oestrogen receptor in an immunohistochemical assay (ER-IHA) for paraffin wax embedded tissue.

Methods: Breast cancer specimens were surgically obtained from 119 previously untreated patients. For comparison, oestrogen receptor was measured from cytosol fractions using an established oestrogen receptor enzyme immunoassay (ER-EIA) method. Oestrogen receptor "H-scores" were obtained from the ER-IHA after antigen retrieval using microwave treatment. Where discrepancies occurred between the two methods, further immunohistochemistry was performed using the H222 antibody from the Abbott Laboratories ER-ICA kit.

Results: The correlation between the two methods was non- linear, but despite this there was an 86% concordance between ER-EIA and ER-IHA using the 1D5 ER antibody. Fifty four per cent of tumours (64/119) were oestrogen receptor positive and 32% (38/119) were negative by both assays. A mismatch between the ER-EIA and ER-IHA occurred in 17 cases. Seven tumours were IHA positive but EIA+, but five of these were borderline negative by EIA, having values of > 5 and < 10 fmol/mg protein. Ten tumours were IHA negative and EIA+; four of these tumours were completely negative by IHA in the section studied. A further IHA assay, carried out on the 17 tumour mismatches with H222 antibody, showed that three tumours remained substantially discordant. These three tumours were strongly positive with the 1D5 antibody and negative with the H222 antibody. Two of these discordant tumours were of the rare ER negative and PgR positive phenotype and may contain oestrogen receptor that is of biological interest but which lacks the hormone binding epitope.

Conclusions: The concordance between the classic enzyme immunoassay technique and the new immunohistochemical method on paraffin wax embedded sections was good. Moreover, the IHA technique using the 1D5 antibody against the N-terminal was easily reproducible. This technique may allow oestrogen receptor content to be determined in large cohorts of patients in whom archival tumour material is available.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur J Cancer. 1990 Apr;26(4):442-9 - PubMed
    1. Int J Cancer. 1993 Oct 21;55(4):651-4 - PubMed
    1. J Histochem Cytochem. 1981 Apr;29(4):577-80 - PubMed
    1. J Steroid Biochem. 1982 Mar;16(3):353-9 - PubMed
    1. Br J Cancer. 1983 Apr;47(4):511-5 - PubMed

Publication types