Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Oct;47(10):954-6.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.10.954.

Evaluation of three commercial enzyme immunoassay kits for detecting faecal Clostridium difficile toxins

Affiliations

Evaluation of three commercial enzyme immunoassay kits for detecting faecal Clostridium difficile toxins

S A Arrow et al. J Clin Pathol. 1994 Oct.

Abstract

The detection of faecal cytotoxicity using tissue culture was compared with three commercial Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits; Premier C difficile toxin A (Meridian Diagnostic, Inc.); CD-TOX C difficile toxin A (Porton Cambridge); and Cytoclone A+B EIA (Cambridge Biotech Corporation). Of 160 faecal samples examined by all four methods, 52 (32.5%) were cytotoxic, 44 (27.5%) were positive by Premier, 48 (30%) by CD-TOX EIA, and 50 (31.3%) with Cytoclone. When compared with detection of cytotoxicity by tissue culture assay, the following performance indices were obtained: Premier, sensitivity 84.1%, specificity 99.1%, positive predictive value (PPV) 97.8%, negative predictive value (NPV) 93%; CD-TOX, sensitivity 92.3%, specificity 88.0%, PPV 78.7%, NPV 95.9%; Cytoclone, sensitivity 96.2%, specificity 93.5%, PPV 87.7%, NPV 98.1%. EIA results were available within three hours, whereas the results of the cytotoxin assay were available after 24-48 hours. All three kits provided satisfactory results and, although relatively expensive, all could be used in the laboratory effectively to screen for diarrhoeal disease associated with C difficile.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Aug;7(4):476-84 - PubMed
    1. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988 Jan;1(1):1-18 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Dec;29(12):2724-30 - PubMed
    1. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993 Jul;6(3):251-65 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Mar;11(3):246-9 - PubMed