Stereopsis testing without polarized glasses: a comparison study on five new stereoacuity tests
- PMID: 7963223
Stereopsis testing without polarized glasses: a comparison study on five new stereoacuity tests
Abstract
Background: Stereopsis testing is commonly used to assess the presence and level of binocular vision. A new series of stereopsis tests requiring no polarized goggles are available in the form of the Titmus Stereo Test, the Stereo Reindeer Test, the Random Dot Butterfly, the Random Dot Figures, and the Random E, Circle, Square. These polarized-free tests employ a special prismatic printing process creating a panagraphic presentation, i.e., a separate image is presented to each eye without the need for polarization. The purpose of this study was to compare the polarized-free stereo tests with their traditional polarized counterparts.
Methods: Thirty four subjects, including several persons with strabismus, ages 10-35 years, were each tested with the polarized and polarized-free versions of the Titmus, Reindeer, Butterfly, and Figures. Twenty nine of these subjects were tested with the Random Dot E. Half the subjects were tested first with polarized-free and half were tested first with polarized tests. Tests were performed according to manufacturer instructions by the same examiner in clinical settings.
Results: The results (matched pair ranked correlation coefficients) indicate that the polarized-free tests were highly correlated (r = 0.997, r = 0.998, r = 0.997, r = 1.00, and r = 1.00 respectively) with the polarized comparison tests. No significant difference (Wilcoxon Ranked Sign) in the stereopsis level was obtained between the two versions of the tests.
Conclusions: We conclude that these five polarized-free tests were just as valid in measuring the subjects' stereopsis as their traditional polarized version. The use of goggle-free testing has potential clinical advantages, e.g., testing of young children who will not wear the glasses or the improved observation of the ocular alignment during stereopsis testing.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of stereopsis testing between red/green targets and polarized targets in children with normal binocular vision.Optometry. 2008 Mar;79(3):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2007.05.013. Optometry. 2008. PMID: 18302956
-
Development of stereoscopic acuity: longitudinal study using a computer-based random-dot stereo test.Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan-Feb;49(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s10384-004-0141-4. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 15692766
-
A new method for assessing motion-in-depth perception in strabismic patients.Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan;92(1):47-50. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.117507. Epub 2007 Jun 27. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008. PMID: 17596334
-
Does stereopsis matter in humans?Eye (Lond). 1996;10 ( Pt 2):233-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.1996.51. Eye (Lond). 1996. PMID: 8776453 Review.
-
Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth?Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Jul;101(4):485-494. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12655. Epub 2018 Jan 27. Clin Exp Optom. 2018. PMID: 29377291 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Differences in stereoacuity between crossed and uncrossed disparities reduce with practice.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Nov;42(6):1353-1362. doi: 10.1111/opo.13040. Epub 2022 Aug 23. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022. PMID: 35997266 Free PMC article.
-
Binocular function in school children with reading difficulties.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun;248(6):885-92. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1251-y. Epub 2009 Dec 4. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 19960202
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical