Masticatory function in patients with congenital and acquired maxillofacial defects
- PMID: 7965904
- DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90344-1
Masticatory function in patients with congenital and acquired maxillofacial defects
Abstract
Ninety-eight patients who received prosthodontic treatment for maxillofacial defects were examined clinically and by means of questionnaires and registration of chewing efficiency and occlusal force. Although 30% of the patients stated that they could chew soft food, and one third could not chew the test food (almonds), only 14% said they had a poor chewing ability. The mean occlusal force was small (80 N) but the individual variation was great (median 49 N, maximum 327 N). Despite major defects and poor functional test results, most patients were remarkably well-adapted to their situation and to maxillofacial prosthodontic rehabilitation. Severe signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders were rare.
Similar articles
-
A study of some masticatory functions in 90-year old subjects.Gerodontology. 1994 Jul;11(1):25-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.1994.tb00099.x. Gerodontology. 1994. PMID: 7713539
-
Clinical interpretation of a masticatory normative indicator analysis of masticatory function in subjects with different occlusal and prosthodontic status.J Dent. 2013 May;41(5):443-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Feb 21. J Dent. 2013. PMID: 23438416
-
Masticatory function parameters in patients with removable dental prosthesis.J Med Life. 2019 Jan-Mar;12(1):43-48. doi: 10.25122/jml-2019-0028. J Med Life. 2019. PMID: 31123524 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Speech and other oral functions. Clinical and experimental studies with special reference to maxillary rehabilitation on osseointegrated implants.Swed Dent J Suppl. 1993;91:1-39. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1993. PMID: 8316941 Review.
-
Assessment of mastication with implications for oral rehabilitation: a review.J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Oct;38(10):754-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02197.x. Epub 2011 Jan 17. J Oral Rehabil. 2011. PMID: 21241351 Review.
Cited by
-
Stress distribution on different bar materials in implant-retained palatal obturator.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241589. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33125441 Free PMC article.
-
A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Aramany Class I Obturator Fabricated with Different Alloys.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 Feb;11(Suppl 1):S24-S29. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_226_18. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019. PMID: 30923427 Free PMC article.
-
Masticatory performance and oral health-related quality of life in edentulous maxillectomy patients: A cross-sectional study to compare implant-supported obturators and conventional obturators.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 May;31(5):405-416. doi: 10.1111/clr.13577. Epub 2020 Jan 27. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020. PMID: 31944417 Free PMC article.
-
Reconstruction of maxillofacial bone defects using patient-specific long-lasting titanium implants.Sci Rep. 2022 May 9;12(1):7538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11200-0. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35534499 Free PMC article.
-
Hollow silica reinforced magnesium nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical and biological properties with computational modeling analysis for mandibular reconstruction.Int J Oral Sci. 2020 Nov 17;12(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41368-020-00098-x. Int J Oral Sci. 2020. PMID: 33203862 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical