The capacity of Drosophila for detecting relevant genetic damage
- PMID: 796713
- DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(76)90079-8
The capacity of Drosophila for detecting relevant genetic damage
Abstract
For the detection and study of mutagenic agents, Drosophila offers many advantages. It is a higher organism with a short generation time that is cheap and easy to breed in large numbers. The simple genetic testing methods provide unequivocal answers about the whole spectrum of relevant genetic damage. A comparison of the detection capacity of assays sampling different kinds of genetic damage revealed that various substances are highly effective in inducing mutations, but do not produce chromosome breakage effects at all, or only at much higher concentrations than those required for mutation induction. Of the different assay systems available, the classical sex-linked recessive lethal test thus deserves priority, in view of its superior capacity to detect mutagens. Of practical importance is also its high sensitivity, because a large number of loci in one-fifth of the genome is tested for newly induced forward mutations, including small deletions. Drosophila is capable of carrying out the same metabolic activation reactions as the mammalian liver. An additional advantage, in this respect, is the capacity of Drosophila for detecting short-lived activation products, because intracellular activation occurs within the spermatids ans spermatocytes. These properties make the test for recessive sex-linked lethals a useful tool for verifying results obtained in the pre-screening of potential mutagens with fast microbial assay systems. In studies on non-disjunction, detailed genetic analysis of the induced changes is possible, and these may shed light on the mechanisms involved. A new adaptation of the bithorax transvection method by Mendelson permits the recovery of high yields of chromosome aberrations in a fast one-generation test.
Similar articles
-
Assaying potential carcinogens with Drosophila.Environ Health Perspect. 1976 Jun;15:141-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7615141. Environ Health Perspect. 1976. PMID: 1001292 Free PMC article.
-
Some aspects of the detection of potential mutagenic agents in Drosophila.Mutat Res. 1975 Aug;29(2):241-50. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(75)90154-2. Mutat Res. 1975. PMID: 1186746
-
Concentration-effect studies with MMS, TEB, 2, 4, 6-TriCl-PDMT, and DEN on the induction of dominant and recessive lethals, chromosome loss and translocations in Drosophila sterm.Mutat Res. 1975 Sep;29(3):383-96. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(75)90059-7. Mutat Res. 1975. PMID: 809703
-
Whole-mammal mutagenicity tests: evaluation of five methods.Mutat Res. 1980 May;75(3):279-302. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(80)90030-5. Mutat Res. 1980. PMID: 6991917 Review.
-
The sex-linked recessive lethal test for mutagenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.Mutat Res. 1983 Oct;123(2):183-279. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(83)90025-8. Mutat Res. 1983. PMID: 6413857 Review.
Cited by
-
Protective effects of tea polyphenols and β-carotene against γ-radiation induced mutation and oxidative stress in Drosophila melanogaster.Genes Environ. 2017 Nov 1;39:24. doi: 10.1186/s41021-017-0084-x. eCollection 2017. Genes Environ. 2017. PMID: 29118865 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanisms of nondisjunction induction in drosophila oocytes.Environ Health Perspect. 1979 Aug;31:41-3. doi: 10.1289/ehp.793141. Environ Health Perspect. 1979. PMID: 499127 Free PMC article.
-
Test systems for mutagenicity screening of environmental chemicals and their relevance for the evaluation of genetic hazards to man.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1981;99(1-2):87-102. doi: 10.1007/BF00412446. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1981. PMID: 7251641 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases