Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1994 Jul;21(6):1051-6; discussion 1057.

Using social support to promote breast self-examination performance

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7971411
Clinical Trial

Using social support to promote breast self-examination performance

L M Lierman et al. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1994 Jul.

Erratum in

  • Oncol Nurs Forum 1994 Oct;21(9):1455

Abstract

Purpose/objectives: To describe support strategies used by selected partners and peer partners in a study examining the effects of support on adherence to breast self-examination (BSE).

Design: Experimental.

Setting: Large health maintenance organization in the Pacific Northwest.

Sample: 175 women (mean age of 61 years) and 53 partners selected by one of the study groups.

Methods: Subjects were assigned to one of three groups: selected-partner support, peer-partner support, and no support. All groups attended a BSE group instructional session consisting of group discussion, a BSE slide presentation, and one-on-one practice of BSE. Members of the selected-partner and peer-partner support groups wrote contracts to provide supportive activities over the subsequent six months to ensure BSE performance. At 6 and 12 months, all participants completed a questionnaire to determine BSE adherence and perceptions of the support experience.

Main research variables: Performance of BSE, supportive activities provided, and perceptions of support.

Findings: Selected partner/subject dyads identified nearly three times the total number of support strategies (147 versus 55) and had greater variability in the types of support categories developed. These subjects had significantly more contact from their support partners, were more comfortable with their partners, and indicated greater likelihood of continuing the supportive contact after the study period.

Conclusions: Selected partners demonstrated more involvement and commitment in fulfilling their supportive role than did peer partners. Further research is needed that will allow more reciprocity between selected partner and subject.

Implications for nursing practice: Nurses can encourage women to recruit supportive partners who help them incorporate BSE into a health maintenance regimen in a consistent fashion. Partners can benefit from some structured orientation to the support process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types