Contraception in The Netherlands: the low abortion rate explained
- PMID: 7971545
- DOI: 10.1016/0738-3991(94)90032-9
Contraception in The Netherlands: the low abortion rate explained
Abstract
This article gives a review of the main factors that are related to the low abortion rate in the Netherlands. Attention is payed to figures on abortion and the use of contraceptive methods since the beginning of the 1960s up to the end of the 1980s. The strong acceptance of family planning was influenced by changing values regarding sexuality and the family, the transition from an agricultural to a modern industrial society, rapid economic growth, declining influence of the churches on daily life, introduction of modern mass media and the increased general educational level. The introduction of modern contraceptives (mainly the pill and contraceptive sterilization) was stimulated by a strong voluntary family planning movement, fear for overpopulation, a positive role of GPs, and the public health insurance system. A reduction of unwanted pregnancies has been accomplished through successful strategies for the prevention of teenage pregnancy (including sex education, open discussions on sexuality in mass media, educational campaigns and low barrier services) as well as through wide acceptance of sterilization. The Dutch experience with family planning shows the following characteristics: a strong wish to reduce reliance on abortion, ongoing sexual and contraceptive education related to the actual experiences of the target groups, and low barrier family planning services.
PIP: People in the Netherlands consider unplanned pregnancy to be a large problem that society and decision-makers should and do seriously address. The abortion rate fluctuates between 5 to 7/1000 women of reproductive age, the lowest abortion rate in the world. Between 1965 and 1975, a shift from a largely agricultural society to an industrial society, rapid economic growth and the establishment of a welfare state, a reduced influence of the church in public and personal life, introduction of mass media, and a rapid increase in the educational level of both men and women brought about a rapid change in traditional values and family relations in the Netherlands. These changes and the introduction of modern contraception effected a breakthrough in family planning and sexual morality. Factors facilitating the rapid transition to a contraceptive society in the Netherlands were a voluntary family planning movement, fear of overpopulation, role of general practitioners in providing family planning services, and inclusion of family planning in the national public health insurance system. Acceptance of contraception preceded liberalization of abortion. Society accepts abortion as only a last resort. The sexual sterilization rate is higher than that in other European countries (25% vs. 0-23%). Special family planning programs in the Netherlands target groups at risk of unwanted pregnancy, particularly teenage pregnancy. Almost all secondary schools and about 50% of primary schools address sexuality and contraception. Sex education has largely been integrated in general health education programs. The mass media address adolescent sexuality and preventive behavior. Very large scale, nonmoralistic, public education campaigns that are positive towards teenage sexual behavior appear to be successful. Teens have wide access to contraceptive services through general practitioners who maintain confidentiality and do not require a vaginal exam and through subsidized family planning clinics.
Similar articles
-
Preventing unwanted pregnancies.BMJ. 1991 Sep 14;303(6803):598. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6803.598. BMJ. 1991. PMID: 1932899 Free PMC article.
-
The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries.Eur J Popul. 1987 Nov;3(1):7-32. doi: 10.1007/BF01797090. Eur J Popul. 1987. PMID: 12280731
-
Adolescent reproductive behavior: an international comparison of developed countries.Adv Adolesc Mental Health. 1990;4:13-34. Adv Adolesc Mental Health. 1990. PMID: 12317626
-
Adolescent pregnancy: occurrence and consequences.Pediatr Ann. 1993 Feb;22(2):85-8. doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-19930201-05. Pediatr Ann. 1993. PMID: 8493058 Review.
-
Adolescent contraception.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Sep;24(3):977-86. doi: 10.1097/00003081-198109000-00022. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1981. PMID: 7026115 Review.
Cited by
-
How have changes in accessibility and public funding influenced contraceptive use among Norwegian adolescents? A cohort study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Sep;103(9):1789-1798. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14905. Epub 2024 Jun 27. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024. PMID: 38937966 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.BMJ. 2002 Jun 15;324(7351):1426. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1426. BMJ. 2002. PMID: 12065267 Free PMC article.
-
Must we fear adolescent sexuality?MedGenMed. 2004 Dec 30;6(4):44. MedGenMed. 2004. PMID: 15775871 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Women Do Not Utilise Family Planning According to Their Needs in Southern Malawi: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 13;18(8):4072. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084072. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33924290 Free PMC article.
-
On sex education at school. Dutch surprise at British question.BMJ. 1995 Nov 4;311(7014):1226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7014.1226b. BMJ. 1995. PMID: 7488915 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical