Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1994 Jun;17(4):378-92.
doi: 10.1093/sleep/17.4.378.

Portable recording in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea. ASDA standards of practice

Affiliations
Review

Portable recording in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea. ASDA standards of practice

R Ferber et al. Sleep. 1994 Jun.

Erratum in

  • Portable Recording in the Assessment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
    Ferber R, Millman R, Coppola M, Fleetham J, Friederich Murray C, Iber C, McCall WV, Nino-Murcia G, Pressman M, Sanders M, Strohl K, Votteri B, Williams A. Ferber R, et al. Sleep. 2018 Sep 1;41(9). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy134. Sleep. 2018. PMID: 30053286 No abstract available.

Abstract

The objective assessment of patients with a presumptive diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has primarily used attended polysomnographic study. Recent technologic advances and issues of availability, convenience and cost have led to a rapid increase in the use of portable recording devices. However, limited scientific information has been published regarding the evaluation of the efficacy, accuracy, validity, utility, cost effectiveness and limitations of this portable equipment. Attaining a clear assessment of the role of portable devices is complicated by the multiplicity of recording systems and the variability of clinical settings in which they have been analyzed. This paper reviews the current knowledge base regarding portable recording in the assessment of OSA, including technical considerations, validation studies, potential advantages and disadvantages, issues of safety, current clinical usage and areas most in need of further study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources