Complications of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Abstract

From 1973-1985 to 1988 the average patient complications per case were 1.44 per case and significantly increased during 1990 to 1992 to 2.10 per case (Figure 3). During the same periods patient survival significantly decreased from 84% (1973-1985 to 1988, n = 2463) to 80% (1990 to 1992, n = 4005) (Figure 4). The association between total complication rates and survival rate was examined by regression analysis (Table 5). The correlation of patient complication rate and total complication rate with survival is highly significant; however, causality cannot be established. When comparing different entry criteria (Table 2) for incidence of mechanical and patient complications, no significant differences are apparent. This is not surprising since each of the entry criteria were designed to identify the same patient population. When premature neonates (> 35 weeks) were placed on ECMO, 36% of them had intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) with 62% mortality while only 12% of the neonates < 35 weeks had ICH and a 49% mortality. Similar findings were noted with low birthweight neonates (< 2.2 kg), 28% had ICH with 64% mortality while only 12% of the neonates > 2.2 kg had ICH with a 50% mortality. Selection criteria remain problematic for a variety of reasons. They cannot be viewed as absolute because of variability between centres. What represents likely 80% mortality in one centre may not apply to another. Historical controls are misleading because changing respiratory therapy strategies make historical populations difficult to compare. Also, once an ECMO centre becomes established, a more challenging group of patients will be attracted than previously was the case. Further, a single entry criterion cannot be generalized for all entry diagnoses. Criteria for an 80% predicted mortality is probably not the same for MAS, CHN, PPHN, and sepsis. Subsequent patients registered in the Neonatal ECMO Registry of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization will address these issues more thoroughly, as specific details of the pre-ECMO condition and therapeutic strategies are collected. This collective review should help to identify trends which require reassessment of technique or patient management.