Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Dec;37(6):487-91.

Selective surgical management in penetrating neck injuries

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7982153

Selective surgical management in penetrating neck injuries

G C Velmahos et al. Can J Surg. 1994 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate selective operative management in penetrating neck trauma.

Design: A chart review.

Setting: A university-affiliated hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Patients: All adults admitted to the hospital between January 1988 and June 1993 with a penetrating neck wound. Excluded were patients in whom there was no suspicion of an occult injury that might need further investigation. There were 755 patients in the study.

Interventions: Immediate surgical exploration (group A, 613 patients) and observation with constant monitoring (group B, 142 patients).

Main outcome measures: Unnecessary explorations in group A and missed significant injuries in group B.

Results: In group A there was a 3% incidence of unnecessary explorations, and 4.2% of the patients died. In group B there was a 9.1% incidence of missed injuries, and 2.8% of the patients died as a result of the delayed diagnosis. Overall the death rate was 4%.

Conclusion: Selective operative intervention for penetrating neck trauma results in fewer negative explorations and a death rate comparable to those of series that support mandatory neck exploration.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources