Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization
- PMID: 7984193
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199412293312602
Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization
Abstract
Background: Although catheterization of the subclavian vein is a common procedure, the risk factors for complications and failures, with the exception of the physician's experience, are poorly understood. Ultrasonography has been recommended to help guide the placement of central venous catheters.
Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized trial of ultrasound-guided location of the subclavian vein as compared with standard insertion procedures. In the group of patients undergoing catheterization with ultrasound guidance, the site of the insertion was marked before the catheterization attempt; real-time ultrasound guidance was not used. The 821 eligible patients (411 in the ultrasound group and 410 in the control group) underwent catheterization in a single procedure suite under controlled nonemergency conditions, in most cases for the administration of chemotherapy.
Results: Ultrasound guidance had no effect on the rate of complications or failures of subclavian-vein catheterization (risk ratio for complications, 1.00; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 1.52; risk ratio for failures, 1.04; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.72 to 1.50). In multivariate analyses, prior major surgery in the region (P = 0.002), a body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) higher than 30 or lower than 20 (P = 0.009), and previous catheterization (P = 0.043) were associated with failed attempts. Complications were also associated with failed attempts: 52 of the 721 patients (7.2 percent) in whom catheterization was successful had complications, as compared with 28 of the 100 patients (28 percent) in whom physicians were unable to place catheters. The number of needle passes was strongly associated with the rates of failure and complications. The complication rate rose from 4.3 percent with one pass to 24.0 percent with more than two passes.
Conclusions: Ultrasound guidance of subclavian-vein catheterization, as used in this study, was not beneficial. In patients at highest risk for complications and failures, catheterization should be attempted by the most experienced physicians available.
Comment in
-
Defining the risks of subclavian-vein catheterization.N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 29;331(26):1769-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199412293312609. N Engl J Med. 1994. PMID: 7605425 No abstract available.
-
Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization.N Engl J Med. 1995 Jun 8;332(23):1579-80; author reply 1581. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199506083322313. N Engl J Med. 1995. PMID: 7605464 No abstract available.
-
Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization.N Engl J Med. 1995 Jun 8;332(23):1580; author reply 1581. N Engl J Med. 1995. PMID: 7605465 No abstract available.
-
Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization.N Engl J Med. 1995 Jun 8;332(23):1580; author reply 1581. N Engl J Med. 1995. PMID: 7739719 No abstract available.
-
Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization.N Engl J Med. 1995 Jun 8;332(23):1580-1. N Engl J Med. 1995. PMID: 7739720 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Subclavian venous catheterization: greater success rate for less experienced operators using ultrasound guidance.Crit Care Med. 1995 Apr;23(4):692-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199504000-00018. Crit Care Med. 1995. PMID: 7661944 Clinical Trial.
-
Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the landmark method in critical care patients: a prospective randomized study.Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1607-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318218a1ae. Crit Care Med. 2011. PMID: 21494105 Clinical Trial.
-
Prospective, randomized trial of Doppler-assisted subclavian vein catheterization.Arch Surg. 1998 Oct;133(10):1089-93. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1089. Arch Surg. 1998. PMID: 9790206 Clinical Trial.
-
The role of sonography in the placement and management of jugular and subclavian central venous catheters.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Aug;163(2):291-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.2.8037017. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994. PMID: 8037017 Review.
-
Quality improvement: ultrasonography-guided venous catheterization in organ transplantation.Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009 Jun;14(3):281-5. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e328329400c. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009. PMID: 19318945 Review.
Cited by
-
Subclavian Artery Injury Following Central Venous Catheter Placement.Cureus. 2021 Apr 4;13(4):e14287. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14287. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 33968501 Free PMC article.
-
[Iatrogenic carotid-jugular arterio-venous fistula: a rare complication associated with jugular venous catheterization (a case report)].Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Dec 24;37:379. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.379.26146. eCollection 2020. Pan Afr Med J. 2020. PMID: 33796192 Free PMC article. French.
-
A Venous Catheter Complication: Venous Perforation and Lung Injury.Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014 Oct;42(5):270-2. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.64325. Epub 2014 Jul 9. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014. PMID: 27366434 Free PMC article.
-
Should ultrasound guidance be used for central venous catheterisation in the emergency department?Emerg Med J. 2005 Mar;22(3):158-64. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.011288. Emerg Med J. 2005. PMID: 15735260 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of admission liver stiffness on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.Heart Vessels. 2019 Jun;34(6):984-991. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1318-y. Epub 2018 Dec 6. Heart Vessels. 2019. PMID: 30523443
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical