Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 1994 Sep;33(3):258-62.
doi: 10.1097/00000637-199409000-00005.

Magnetic resonance imaging of in situ mammary prostheses

Affiliations
Case Reports

Magnetic resonance imaging of in situ mammary prostheses

D B Drake et al. Ann Plast Surg. 1994 Sep.

Abstract

A study was conducted at the University of Virginia Health Sciences Center to examine the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting rupture or deflation of in situ mammary prostheses. Thirty-three women with 59 prostheses were included in the study. Fifteen of the 33 patients had undergone surgery for removal or replacement of 21 implants. Positive findings for rupture were accurately predicted for 15 implants and confirmed at surgery. Negative findings for rupture were accurately predicted in the remaining 6 implants and confirmed at surgery. Although it is a more costly procedure than either mammography or ultrasonography, we believe that magnetic resonance imaging is also more accurate in detecting damaged implants, particularly when they are contained within an intact capsule or when the implants are stacked. Unlike mammography, magnetic resonance imaging requires no ionizing radiation or breast compression. Magnetic resonance imaging of the in situ breast prosthesis may be a useful adjunct when other modalities yield inconclusive results or when a contained rupture is suspected.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources