Editorial
doi: 10.1038/372485a0.
More patent troubles about genes
- PMID: 7990908
- DOI: 10.1038/372485a0
Item in Clipboard
Editorial
More patent troubles about genes
Nature.
.
Abstract
Two decisions by the British Appeal Court raise questions about the allowable breadth of biotechnology patents, but point to the charges patent-holders should be free to make.
Similar articles
-
House of Lords is asked to rule on breadth of gene patent coverage.Nature. 1994 Dec 8;372(6506):487-8. doi: 10.1038/372487a0. Nature. 1994. PMID: 7990909 No abstract available.
-
US Supreme Court rules on landmark gene patent case.Pharm Pat Anal. 2013 Sep;2(5):581. doi: 10.4155/ppa.13.54. Pharm Pat Anal. 2013. PMID: 24237164 No abstract available.
-
Patent infringement. High court asked to rule on what makes an idea new.Science. 2001 Dec 21;294(5551):2460-1. doi: 10.1126/science.294.5551.2460. Science. 2001. PMID: 11752553 No abstract available.
-
Decoding gene patents in Australia.Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014 Oct 3;5(1):a020909. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020909. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014. PMID: 25280901 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What is your reasonable expectation of success in obtaining pharmaceutical or biotechnology patents having nonobvious claimed inventions that the courts will uphold? An overview of obviousness court decisions.Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014 Dec 4;5(4):a020875. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020875. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014. PMID: 25475106 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
