Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1994 Aug 22;156(34):4829, 4832-3.

[Treatment of episiotomy wound infections. Incision and drainage versus incision, curettage and sutures under antibiotic cover--a randomized trial]

[Article in Danish]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 7992418
Clinical Trial

[Treatment of episiotomy wound infections. Incision and drainage versus incision, curettage and sutures under antibiotic cover--a randomized trial]

[Article in Danish]
S Christensen et al. Ugeskr Laeger. .

Abstract

Conventional, "open" treatment of episiotomy wound infections was compared to incision, curettage and primary suture under antibiotic cover in a prospective, randomized study. During the period 1.5.1986-31.12.1988 there were 4154 vaginal deliveries with episiotomy, of which 20 (0.48%) became infected. Seventeen of these patients consented to enter the study. Median time for healing was 12 days following suture and 19 days after "open" treatment (not significant). Hospitalization time was the same in the two groups. No re-infections were seen. A need for vaginal plastic repair was found in three of nine of the conventionally treated patients and in none of the patients in the suture group (not significant). It is concluded that treatment of episiotomy wound infections with incision, curettage and primary suture under antibiotic cover is an attractive, safe ad convenient alternative treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer