Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1994 Jun;15(2):113-31.
doi: 10.1007/BF00994020.

The hyperreality of clinical ethics: a unitary theory and hermeneutics

Affiliations
Review

The hyperreality of clinical ethics: a unitary theory and hermeneutics

H Ten Have. Theor Med. 1994 Jun.

Abstract

Medical ethics nowadays is dominated by a conception of ethics as the application of moral theories and principles. This conception is criticized for its depreciation of the internal morality of medical practice and its narrow view of external morality. This view reflects both a lack of interest in the empirical realities of medicine and a neglect of the socio-cultural value-contexts of medical ethical issues, including the creative development of a broader philosophical framework for a practicable medical ethics. Several alternative approaches and conceptions have been proposed. The unified clinical ethics theory, developed by Graber and Thomasma, is an interesting attempt to synthesize these alternative approaches. It correctly identifies as the crucial problem the present disconnectedness of medical ethics from theoretical philosophy as well as the practice of medicine. In this paper, however, it is argued that the unitary theory should take more serious attention to the hermeneutic character of medicine as well as ethics. This implies that the unitary theory must in fact transform itself into an interpretive clinical ethics theory. The theoretical characteristics and practical consequences of an interpretive theory of medical ethics are discussed in the present paper.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Theor Med. 1985 Feb;6(1):115-23 - PubMed
    1. Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Jan-Feb;20(1):5-12 - PubMed
    1. J Med Ethics. 1981 Jun;7(2):67-9 - PubMed
    1. Int J Health Plann Manage. 1989 Jul-Sep;4(3):167-80 - PubMed
    1. Theor Med. 1985 Feb;6(1):1-42 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources