Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1994 Jul;62(1):121-5.
doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56826-5.

The role of estrogen support during the luteal phase of in vitro fertilization-embryo transplant cycles: a comparative study between progesterone alone and estrogen and progesterone support

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

The role of estrogen support during the luteal phase of in vitro fertilization-embryo transplant cycles: a comparative study between progesterone alone and estrogen and progesterone support

A Lewin et al. Fertil Steril. 1994 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the possible role for estrogen supplementation to the P luteal phase support of GnRH agonists (GnRH-a)- and hMG-induced IVF-ET cycles.

Setting: In vitro fertilization unit in a tertiary care university hospital.

Design: A prospectively randomized study.

Patients: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing ET after IVF were assigned into one of two luteal supplementation regimens.

Interventions: In all patients enrolled in the study, ovulation was induced using the midluteal regimen for pituitary down regulation with GnRH-a followed by follicular stimulation with hMG. The first group received IM P 50 mg/d, as luteal phase support, starting the day of ET. The second group received the same dosage of P, combined with oral E2 valerate, 2 mg/d. Serum levels of P and E2 were monitored every 4 days for 16 days after ET.

Main outcome measures: Pregnancy rates (PRs) and live birth rates per ET.

Results: No significant difference in E2 or P levels throughout the cycle was observed between groups. Similar PRs per ET and the live birth rates were also observed between group A and B (28% versus 26.5% and 78.6% versus 76.1%, respectively).

Conclusion: No advantage was found in the addition of E2 valerate to P luteal phase support of GnRH-a- and hMG-induced IVF-ET cycles.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources