[Pharmacokinetics of epidural or intrathecal bupivacaine in elective cesarean section]
- PMID: 8017669
- DOI: 10.1016/s0750-7658(05)80621-5
[Pharmacokinetics of epidural or intrathecal bupivacaine in elective cesarean section]
Abstract
Twenty ASA 1 pregnant women at term, undergoing elective Caesarean section were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups, receiving either a spinal or an epidural anaesthesia. Before induction, in order to prevent hypotension, all patients were given an i.v. infusion of 1000 ml of Ringer-lactate and a subcutaneous injection of ephedrine 30 mg. They were positioned on the operating table with a 15 degrees left lateral tilt. Spinal anaesthesia was performed with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 p. cent (0.08 mg.cm-1 of height). Epidural anaesthesia was obtained with a bolus dose of 0.5 p. cent plain bupivacaine, followed by a continuous infusion through the epidural catheter until the level of surgical block reached T6 bilaterally. Bupivacaine was assayed in plasma by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Following pharmacokinetic parameters of bupivacaine were determined: Cmax (maximal concentration), Tmax (time to reach maximum), AUC (area under curve), Cl (total plasma clearance), Vz (volume of distribution during the elimination phase), T1/2 (elimination half-life). Bupivacaine concentration was also measured in samples obtained at birth from umbilical vein and umbilical artery. The mean dose of bupivacaine used was 12.8 +/- 0.6 mg in the spinal group and 118.6 +/- 17.8 mg in the epidural group. The time of onset of surgical anaesthesia was significantly shorter with spinal anaesthesia (7.6 +/- 4.4 vs 31 +/- 11.1 min; p < 0.01). The sensory block had a longer duration in epidural group (223.2 +/- 15 vs 291 +/- 13.8; p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
A randomized comparison of onset of anesthesia between spinal bupivacaine 5 mg with immediate epidural 2% lidocaine 5 mL and bupivacaine 10 mg for cesarean delivery.Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014 Feb;23(1):40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Aug 26. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014. PMID: 24200700 Clinical Trial.
-
Epidural block with ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective caesarean section: maternal cardiovascular parameters, comfort and neonatal well-being.Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Jan;20(1):7-12. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002649. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004. PMID: 14741065 Clinical Trial.
-
Hyperbaric prilocaine vs. hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in women undergoing elective caesarean section: a comparative randomised double-blind study.Anaesthesia. 2021 Jun;76(6):777-784. doi: 10.1111/anae.15342. Epub 2021 Jan 11. Anaesthesia. 2021. PMID: 33428221 Clinical Trial.
-
The anaesthetic and recovery profile of two concentrations (0.25% and 0.50%), of intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine for combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anaesthesia in patients undergoing modified Stark method caesarean delivery: a double blinded randomized trial.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Dec;17(23):3229-36. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013. PMID: 24338466 Clinical Trial.
-
Hyperbaric vs. isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: a Cochrane systematic review.Anaesthesia. 2018 Apr;73(4):499-511. doi: 10.1111/anae.14084. Epub 2017 Oct 17. Anaesthesia. 2018. PMID: 29044483
Cited by
-
Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(2):CD003765. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003765.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. PMID: 15106218 Free PMC article.
-
Spinal anaesthesia with Chloroprocaine HCl 1% for elective lower limb procedures of short duration: a prospective, randomised, observer-blind study in adult patients.BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb 20;21(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01279-9. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021. PMID: 33610175 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical