Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1537-40.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1537.

Injury patterns in cyclists attending an accident and emergency department: a comparison of helmet wearers and non-wearers

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Injury patterns in cyclists attending an accident and emergency department: a comparison of helmet wearers and non-wearers

C Maimaris et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To study circumstances of bicycle accidents and nature of injuries sustained and to determine effect of safety helmets on pattern of injuries.

Design: Prospective study of patients with cycle related injuries.

Setting: Accident and emergency department of teaching hospital.

Subjects: 1040 patients with complete data presenting to the department in one year with cycle related injuries, of whom 114 had worn cycle helmets when accident occurred.

Main outcome measures: Type of accident and nature and distribution of injuries among patients with and without safety helmets.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to type of accident or nature and distribution of injuries other than those to the head. Head injury was sustained by 4/114 (4%) of helmet wearers compared with 100/928 (11%) of non-wearers (P = 0.023). Significantly more children wore helmets (50/309 (16%)) than did adults (64/731 (9%)) (P < 0.001). The incidence of head injuries sustained in accidents involving motor vehicles (52/288 (18%)) was significantly higher than in those not involving motor vehicles (52/754 (7%)) (chi 2 = 28.9, P < 0.0001). Multiple logistic regression analysis of probability of sustaining a head injury showed that only two variables were significant: helmet use and involvement of a motor vehicle. Mutually adjusted odds ratios showed a risk factor of 2.95 (95% confidence interval 1.95 to 4.47, P < 0.0001) for accidents involving a motor vehicle and a protective factor of 3.25 (1.17 to 9.06, P = 0.024) for wearing a helmet.

Conclusion: The findings suggest an increased risk of sustaining head injury in a bicycle accident when a motor vehicle is involved and confirm protective effect of helmet wearing for any bicycle accident.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Protection afforded by cycle helmets.
    McDermott F, Lane J. McDermott F, et al. BMJ. 1994 Oct 1;309(6958):877. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6958.877b. BMJ. 1994. PMID: 7950635 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Cycle helmets and the law.
    Evans L. Evans L. BMJ. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1521-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1521. BMJ. 1994. PMID: 8019304 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. J Trauma. 1975 Jun;15(6):504-6 - PubMed
    1. J Trauma. 1983 Aug;23(8):745-55 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 May 16;294(6582):1267-9 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Apr 23;296(6630):1144 - PubMed
    1. Accid Anal Prev. 1988 Jun;20(3):177-85 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms