Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1994 Jun;60(6):1974-7.
doi: 10.1128/aem.60.6.1974-1977.1994.

Evaluation of MK filters for recovery of enteroviruses from tap water

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of MK filters for recovery of enteroviruses from tap water

J F Ma et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Jun.

Abstract

The MK filter is an electropositively charged filter that can be used to concentrate enteroviruses from large volumes (400 to 1,000 liters) of water. This filter is less expensive than the commonly used 1MDS electropositive filter. In this study, we compared the recovery of poliovirus 1 (PV1) and that of coxsackievirus B3 (CB3) from 378 liters of tap water, using both the MK and the 1MDS filters. Viruses were eluted from the filters with 3% beef extract buffered with 0.05 M glycine (pH 9.5) and reconcentrated via organic flocculation. At high virus inputs (approximately 10(6) PFU), the overall recovery (after elution and reconcentration) of PV1 and CB3 from tap water with the MK filter was less than that achieved with the 1MDS filter (P < 0.05). The recoveries of PV1 from tap water with the MK and 1MDS filters were 73.2% +/- 26% (n = 5 trials) and 90.2% +/- 5.9% (n = 5 trials), respectively. The recoveries of CB3 from tap water with the MK and 1MDS filters were 32.8% +/- 34.5% (n = 4 trials) and 95.8% +/- 12.0% (n = 4 trials), respectively. This study indicated that the MK filter consistently provided lower recovery, with wider variability, of PV1 and CB3 from tap water than the 1MDS filter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Oct;32(4):638-9 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Mar;37(3):588-95 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Aug;40(2):201-10 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Jun;51(6):1326-31 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 May;47(5):989-92 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources