Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 May;112(1):179-87.
doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb13049.x.

Effects of muscarinic M2 and M3 receptor stimulation and antagonism on responses to isoprenaline of guinea-pig trachea in vitro

Affiliations

Effects of muscarinic M2 and M3 receptor stimulation and antagonism on responses to isoprenaline of guinea-pig trachea in vitro

N Watson et al. Br J Pharmacol. 1994 May.

Abstract

1. In guinea-pig and canine airway smooth muscle, there is reduced beta-adrenoceptor agonist sensitivity in tissues pre-contracted with muscarinic agonists when compared to tissues pre-contracted with other spasmogens, such as histamine or leukotriene D4. This reduced sensitivity may be the result of an interaction between muscarinic receptors and beta-adrenoceptors. In this study the effects of M2 receptor antagonism and stimulation have been investigated on the relaxant potency of isoprenaline in guinea-pig isolated tracheal smooth muscle. 2. (+)-cis-Dioxolane contracted isolated tracheal strips in a concentration-dependent manner (EC50 = 11.5 +/- 0.9 nM). The rank order of antagonist apparent affinities (with pA2 values in parentheses) was atropine (9.4 +/- 0.1) > zamifenacin (8.2 +/- 0.1) > para-fluoro-hexahydro-siladiphenidol (p-F-HHSiD, 7.2 +/- 0.1) > pirenzepine (6.5 +/- 0.1) > methoctramine (5.5 +/- 0.1). Schild slopes were not significantly different from unity. This was consistent with a role of muscarinic M3 receptors in mediating contraction. 3. In tissues pre-contracted to 3 g isometric tension using (+)-cis-dioxolane (0.2 microM, approximately EC80), the relaxant potency of isoprenaline was significantly (P < 0.05) increased by 0.3 microM methoctramine (control EC50 = 32.2 +/- 4.3 nM, plus methoctramine EC50 = 19.1 +/- 4.5 nM). This concentration of methoctramine had no effect on contractile responses to (+)-cis-dioxolane (control, EC50 = 17.6 +/- 3.2 nM, plus methoctramine, EC50 = 21.0 +/- 4.4 nM). 4 When acetylcholine (non-selective), (+)-cis-dioxolane (non-selective), L-660,863 ((+/- )-3-(3-amino-1,2,4-oxadiazole-5-yl)-quinuclidine, M2-selective) or SDZ ENS 163 (thiopilocarpine, mixed M2 antagonist,partial M3 agonist) were used to achieve isometric tensions of 3 g, the relaxant potency of isoprenaline ranged from 3.7 +/- 0.3 nM (SDZ ENS 163) to 49.4 +/- 3.2 nM ((+)-cis-dioxolane). Reducing the concentration of these agonists (and therefore the level of developed tension to 2 g), significantly(P<0.05) increased the relaxant potency of isoprenaline. In contrast, when histamine was used to pre-contract tissues to either 2 or 3 g (EC50 = 4.2 +/- 0.6 and 3.8 +/- 1.1 nM, respectively), there was no significant effect on the relaxant potency of isoprenaline.5. There was a slight but significant (P<0.05) reduction in the relaxant potency of isoprenaline, in tissues pre-contracted to 3 g using histamine in combination with (+ )-cis-dioxolane (30 nM). This effect was reversed by M2 receptor antagonism, using methoctramine (1 MicroM).6. These data suggest that in guinea-pig isolated trachea, the relaxant potency of isoprenaline may depend not only on the level of developed tension but also, on the level of muscarinic M2 receptor stimulation/blockade of the spasmogen inducing the tension. However, the lack of selective M2 agonist and the low M2/M3 selectivity of antagonists in this tissue do not permit definitive conclusions to be made about the role of these receptors in modulating isoprenaline potency.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1971 Apr;177(1):1-12 - PubMed
    1. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1959 Mar;14(1):48-58 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984 Sep;57(3):801-7 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1985 May;233(2):409-17 - PubMed
    1. J Med Chem. 1987 Jan;30(1):201-4 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources