Ondansetron plus dexamethasone versus metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine in cisplatin-treated patients with ovarian cancer. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research
- PMID: 8032702
Ondansetron plus dexamethasone versus metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine in cisplatin-treated patients with ovarian cancer. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research
Abstract
Female patients with ovarian cancer are at high risk for emesis. A study evaluating the antiemetic activity and tolerability of ondansetron plus dexamethasone compared to metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine in this group of patients has been performed. A group of 63 patients with ovarian cancer undergoing cisplatin treatment were enrolled in the study. Vomiting, nausea and other side-effects were evaluated by the investigators during the first 24 h and recorded by the patients on a diary card on days 2-4. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone showed a higher antiemetic activity during the first 24 h after cisplatin administration in all three cycles of cisplatin treatment, giving over 90% complete protection from vomiting at the first cycle. The efficacy of ondansetron plus dexamethasone decreased at the second cycle, but the percentage of complete protection from vomiting always remained better than 70%; there was poorer protection in the metoclopramide group, and its effect was similar during all three cycles. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone was also found to be more efficacious than the metoclopramide regimen on the second day after cisplatin administration, while on days 3-4 a high rate of complete protection from emesis was achieved by both antiemetic therapies (> 80%). About 40%-55% of patients receiving ondansetron plus dexamethasone and about 65%-85% of patients treated with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine reported nausea or vomiting during days 1-4. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone is more efficacious than metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine but new strategies to improve antiemetic efficacy in ovarian cancer patients must be outlined.
Comment in
-
Once more: prevention of nausea and emesis in cancer treatment.Support Care Cancer. 1994 May;2(3):141-2. doi: 10.1007/BF00417470. Support Care Cancer. 1994. PMID: 8032696 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Ondansetron + dexamethasone vs metoclopramide + dexamethasone + diphenhydramine in prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Italian Group For Antiemetic Research.Lancet. 1992 Jul 11;340(8811):96-9. Lancet. 1992. PMID: 1352024 Clinical Trial.
-
Difference in persistence of efficacy of two antiemetic regimens on acute emesis during cisplatin chemotherapy. The Italian Group for Antiemetic Research.J Clin Oncol. 1993 Dec;11(12):2396-404. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.12.2396. J Clin Oncol. 1993. PMID: 8246029 Clinical Trial.
-
Ondansetron plus dexamethasone compared to the 'standard' metoclopramide combination.Oncology. 1993 May-Jun;50(3):163-7. doi: 10.1159/000227171. Oncology. 1993. PMID: 8459986 Clinical Trial.
-
Combination antiemetics for cisplatin chemotherapy.Cancer. 1988 Apr 15;61(8):1508-17. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880415)61:8<1508::aid-cncr2820610806>3.0.co;2-h. Cancer. 1988. PMID: 3280112 Review.
-
Ondansetron. An update of its therapeutic use in chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting.Drugs. 1993 Jun;45(6):931-952. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199345060-00006. Drugs. 1993. PMID: 7691500 Review.
Cited by
-
The NK₁ receptor antagonist aprepitant does not alter the pharmacokinetics of high-dose melphalan chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Dec;70(6):903-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03792.x. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010. PMID: 21175446 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Jan;93 Suppl 1:3-17. doi: 10.1007/BF03041988. Med Klin (Munich). 1998. PMID: 19479418 Review. German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical