Task Force 4: The relationship between cardiovascular specialists and generalists

Abstract

1. An imbalance between generalists and cardiovascular subspecialists exists that will require decades to correct. We question the validity of the 50:50 generalist/specialist ratio in view of current practice patterns for cardiology. 2. There has been a large increase in the number of cardiovascular specialists in the past 30 years that will continue if training programs remain at their current size. 3. Cardiovascular specialists provide a substantial amount of inpatient care, care to older patients and care to those with cardiovascular symptoms, although generalists actually provide the majority of office-based cardiovascular care. 4. A significant portion of cardiovascular specialist care can be classified as comprehensive care to patients with and without cardiovascular disease. 5. Most generalists and cardiovascular specialists do not perceive a need for additional cardiovascular specialists. 6. Many providers perform cardiovascular procedures at levels below the recommended threshold for maintenance of clinical competence. 7. Managed care may result in a reduced demand for cardiovascular specialists. 8. If cardiovascular specialists provide general care, it may not be assumed that previous training prepares them for generalist practice. 9. The appropriate boundaries of cardiovascular care between generalists and cardiovascular specialists are indistinct. They are defined somewhat by the training programs from which the generalists graduate. 10. Many generalists have deficiencies in basic skills in clinical cardiology. 11. Desirable interactions between generalists and cardiovascular specialists involve referral of patients in both directions to the provider who can give care to a given patient, at a given time, with the best outcome and lowest cost.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)